ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018
A real-time PCR tool for the surveillance of zoonotic Onchocerca lupi in dogs, cats and potential vectors.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Confirmed cases of human Onchocerca lupi infection: a systematic review of an emerging threat.Parasitology research · 2021Pooled it
- Adulticide treatment with melarsomine: outcome in 283 heartworm-positive dogs in Germany.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Nuclear, mitochondrial, andmSphere · 2026Article
- Recurrence or Reinfection with Onchocerca lupi in a Child in 2021 and 2024 in New Mexico amid Rising Canine Infections.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Onchocerca lupi in shelter dogs from an endemic region of the Southwestern USA.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Beyond Tradition: Exploring Cutting-Edge Approaches for Accurate Diagnosis of Human Filariasis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development of an indirect ELISA for the serodiagnosis of canine infection by Onchocerca lupi.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a long-read metabarcoding platform for the detection of filarial worm pathogens of animals and humans.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Cutaneous filarioid nematodes of dogs in the United States: Are they emerging, neglected, or underdiagnosed parasites?Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Editorial: Dog filariosis: the threat walks not only in the blood stream.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Article
- Molecular detection of zoonotic filarioids in Culex spp. from Portugal.Medical and veterinary entomology · 2021Article
- Zoonotic Ocular Onchocercosis byThe Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021Review
- Efficacy of a spot-on formulation containing moxidectin 2.5%/imidacloprid 10% for the treatment of Cercopithifilaria spp. and Onchocerca lupi microfilariae in naturally infected dogs from Portugal.Parasites & vectors · 2021Article
- Major antigen and paramyosin proteins as candidate biomarkers for serodiagnosis of canine infection by zoonotic Onchocerca lupi.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- First report ofParasitology · 2020Article
- Molecular Approach for the Diagnosis of Blood and Skin Canine Filarioids.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Duplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Clinical Differentiation ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Zoonotic Implications ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Development of a multiplex qPCR-based approach for the diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis, D. repens and Acanthocheilonema reconditum.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ocular onchocercosis is caused by the zoonotic parasite Onchocerca lupi (Spirurida: Onchocercidae). A major hindrance to scientific progress is the absence of a reliable diagnostic test in affected individuals. Microscopic examination of skin snip sediments and the identification of adults embedded in ocular nodules are seldom performed and labour-intensive. A quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay was herein standardized for the detection of O. lupi DNA and the results compared with microscopic examination and conventional PCR (cPCR). The specificity of qPCR and cPCR was assessed by processing the most common filarial nematodes infecting dogs, skin samples from O. lupi infected (n = 35 dogs) or uninfected animals (n = 21 dogs; n = 152 cats) and specimens of potential insect vector (n = 93 blackflies; n = 59 mosquitoes/midges). The analytical sensitivity of both assays was assessed using 10-fold serial dilutions of DNA from adult specimen and from a pool of microfilariae. The qPCR on skin samples revealed an analytical specificity of 100% and a sensitivity up to 8 x 10-1 fg/2μl O. lupi adult-DNA and up to 3.6 x 10-1 pg/2μl of mfs-DNA (corresponding to 1 x 10-2 mfs/2μl). Only 9.5% O. lupi-infected skin samples were positive for cPCR with a sensitivity of 8 x 10-1 pg/2μl of DNA. Out of 152 blackflies and mosquitoes/midges, eight specimens experimentally infected (n = 1 S. erythrocephalum; n = 1 S. ornatum; n = 6 Simulium sp.) were positive by qPCR. The qPCR assay herein standardized represents an important step forward in the diagnosis of zoonotic onchocercosis caused by O. lupi, especially for the detection and quantification of low number of mfs. This assay provides a fundamental contribution for the establishment of surveillance strategies aiming at assessing the presence of O. lupi in carnivores and in insect species acting as potential intermediate hosts. The O. lupi qPCR assay will enable disease progress monitoring as well as the diagnosis of apparently clinical healthy dogs and cats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.