Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29617333›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

A Predictive Model Has Identified Tick-Borne Encephalitis High-Risk Areas in Regions Where No Cases Were Reported Previously, Poland, 1999-2012.

Pawel Stefanoff, Barbara Rubikowska, Jakub Bratkowski, Zbigniew Ustrnul, Sophie O Vanwambeke, Magdalena Rosinska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tick-borne encephalitis epidemiology and surveillance in Poland, and comparison with selected European countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2008 to 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pawel StefanoffDepartment of Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases and Surveillance, National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland. pawel.stefanoff@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-0906
Barbara RubikowskaDepartment of Population Health Monitoring and Analysis, National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland. brubikowska@pzh.gov.pl.
Jakub BratkowskiInstitute of Environmental Protection—National Research Institute (IOS—PIB), 00-548 Warsaw, Poland. jakub.bratkowski@ios.edu.pl.
Zbigniew UstrnulDepartment of Climatology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland. zbigniew.ustrnul@uj.edu.pl.
Sophie O VanwambekeGeorges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth & Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. sophie.vanwambeke@uclouvain.be.
Magdalena RosinskaDepartment of Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases and Surveillance, National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland. mrosinska@pzh.gov.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-6256-7809

Funding

Study of risk factors of tick-borne encephalitis in PolandR01TW007248 · FIC · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYGIENE · PI STEFANOFF, PAWEL · 2007 to 2009
$152k
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW007248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During 1999–2012, 77% of the cases of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) were recorded in two out of 16 Polish provinces. However, historical data, mostly from national serosurveys, suggest that the disease could be undetected in many areas. The aim of this study was to identify which routinely-measured meteorological, environmental, and socio-economic factors are associated to TBE human risk across Poland, with a particular focus on areas reporting few cases, but where serosurveys suggest higher incidence. We fitted a zero-inflated Poisson model using data on TBE incidence recorded in 108 NUTS-5 administrative units in high-risk areas over the period 1999–2012. Subsequently we applied the best fitting model to all Polish municipalities. Keeping the remaining variables constant, the predicted rate increased with the increase of air temperature over the previous 10–20 days, precipitation over the previous 20–30 days, in forestation, forest edge density, forest road density, and unemployment. The predicted rate decreased with increasing distance from forests. The map of predicted rates was consistent with the established risk areas. It predicted, however, high rates in provinces considered TBE-free. We recommend raising awareness among physicians working in the predicted high-risk areas and considering routine use of household animal surveys for risk mapping.

Indexed as

AnimalsEncephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneGeographyHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalPolandRisk AssessmentSurveys and Questionnairesecologic studyepidemiologic determinantsland use predictorstick-borne encephalitiszero-inflated Poisson model

Identifiers

PMID29617333
PMCPMC5923719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.