Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29617015›Full record

ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2018

Quantitative analysis of zero-field splitting parameter distributions in Gd(iii) complexes.

Jessica A Clayton, Katharina Keller, Mian Qi, Julia Wegner, Vanessa Koch, Henrik Hintz, Adelheid Godt, Songi Han, Gunnar Jeschke, Mark S Sherwin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Photoinduced Spin Polarization of a Gadolinium Complex.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gadolinium Spin Decoherence Mechanisms at High Magnetic Fields.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Increasing the Modulation Depth of GdThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Article
  12. Off-the-Shelf Gd(NOThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Two-Armed Probe for In-Cell DEER Measurements on Proteins*.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  18. High-sensitivity GdMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica A ClaytonUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Physics, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. sherwin@physics.ucsb.edu.
Katharina Keller
Mian Qi
Julia Wegner
Vanessa Koch
Henrik Hintz
Adelheid Godt
Songi Han
Gunnar Jeschke
Mark S Sherwin
Maxim Yulikov

Funding

The Role of Lipid Membrane and Hydration on the Oligomerization and Function of PR and A2AR01GM116128 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI HAN, SONGI · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnetic properties of paramagnetic species with spin S > 1/2 are parameterized by the familiar g tensor as well as "zero-field splitting" (ZFS) terms that break the degeneracy between spin states even in the absence of a magnetic field. In this work, we determine the mean values and distributions of the ZFS parameters D and E for six Gd(iii) complexes (S = 7/2) and critically discuss the accuracy of such determination. EPR spectra of the Gd(iii) complexes were recorded in glassy frozen solutions at 10 K or below at Q-band (∼34 GHz), W-band (∼94 GHz) and G-band (240 GHz) frequencies, and simulated with two widely used models for the form of the distributions of the ZFS parameters D and E. We find that the form of the distribution of the ZFS parameter D is bimodal, consisting roughly of two Gaussians centered at D and -D with unequal amplitudes. The extracted values of D (σD) for the six complexes are, in MHz: Gd-NO3Pic, 485 ± 20 (155 ± 37); Gd-DOTA/Gd-maleimide-DOTA, -714 ± 43 (328 ± 99); iodo-(Gd-PyMTA)/MOMethynyl-(Gd-PyMTA), 1213 ± 60 (418 ± 141); Gd-TAHA, 1361 ± 69 (457 ± 178); iodo-Gd-PCTA-[12], 1861 ± 135 (467 ± 292); and Gd-PyDTTA, 1830 ± 105 (390 ± 242). The sign of D was adjusted based on the Gaussian component with larger amplitude. We relate the extracted P(D) distributions to the structure of the individual Gd(iii) complexes by fitting them to a model that superposes the contribution to the D tensor from each coordinating atom of the ligand. Using this model, we predict D, σD, and E values for several additional Gd(iii) complexes that were not measured in this work. The results of this paper may be useful as benchmarks for the verification of quantum chemical calculations of ZFS parameters, and point the way to designing Gd(iii) complexes for particular applications and estimating their magnetic properties a priori.

Identifiers

PMID29617015
PMCPMC6026474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.