ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2018
Biomechanics-based graph matching for augmented CT-CBCT.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Catheter navigation support for liver radioembolization guidance: feasibility of structure-driven intensity-based registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAugmenting intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with preoperative computed tomography data in the context of image-guided liver therapy is proposed. The expected benefit is an improved visualization of tumor(s), vascular system and other internal structures of interest.
methodAn automatic elastic registration based on matching of vascular trees extracted from both the preoperative and intraoperative images is presented. Although methods dedicated to nonrigid graph matching exist, they are not efficient when large intraoperative deformations of tissues occur, as is the case during the liver surgery. The contribution is an extension of the graph matching algorithm using Gaussian process regression (GPR) (Serradell et al. in IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 37(3):625-638, 2015): First, an improved GPR matching is introduced by imposing additional constraints during the matching when the number of hypothesis is large; like the original algorithm, this extended version does not require a manual initialization of matching. Second, a fast biomechanical model is employed to make the method capable of handling large deformations.
resultsThe proposed automatic intraoperative augmentation is evaluated on both synthetic and real data. It is demonstrated that the algorithm is capable of handling large deformations, thus being more robust and reliable than previous approaches. Moreover, the time required to perform the elastic registration is compatible with the intraoperative navigation scenario.
conclusionA biomechanics-based graph matching method, which can handle large deformations and augment intraoperative CBCT, is presented and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29616446What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.