Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29616431›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2018

Cuttlebone as a Marine-Derived Material for Preparing Bone Grafts.

Alisa Palaveniene, Volodymyr Harkavenko, Vitalina Kharchenko, Povilas Daugela, Mindaugas Pranskunas, Gintaras Juodzbalys, Nataliya Babenko, Jolanta Liesiene

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alisa PalavenieneDepartment of Polymer Chemistry and Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, Radvilenu str. 19, 50254, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Volodymyr HarkavenkoDepartment of Ontogenetic Physiology, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine.
Vitalina KharchenkoDepartment of Ontogenetic Physiology, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine.
Povilas DaugelaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, LT-50009, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mindaugas PranskunasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, LT-50009, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gintaras JuodzbalysDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, LT-50009, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Nataliya BabenkoDepartment of Ontogenetic Physiology, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine.
Jolanta LiesieneDepartment of Polymer Chemistry and Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, Radvilenu str. 19, 50254, Kaunas, Lithuania. jolanta.liesiene@ktu.lt.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTV. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University · UAKaunas University of Technology · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of synthetic materials for biomedical applications still presents issues owing to the potential for unfavourable safety characteristics. Currently, there is increasing interest in using natural, marine-derived raw materials for bone tissue engineering. In our study, the endoskeleton of the mollusc Sepia, i.e. cuttlebone (CB), was used with regenerated cellulose (RC) to prepare three-dimensional composite bone grafts. CB microparticles were mechanically immobilised within a cellulose gel, resulting in a macroporous structure upon lyophilisation. The interconnected porous structure of the regenerated cellulose/cuttlebone (RC/CB) composite was evaluated by micro-computed tomography. The porosity of the composite was 80%, and the pore size predominantly ranged from 200 to 500 μm. The addition of CB microparticles increased the specific scaffold surface by almost threefold and was found to be approximately 40 mm

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesCells, CulturedCelluloseRatsRats, WistarSpectrometry, FluorescenceTissue EngineeringCelluloseBone tissue engineeringCuttleboneCytotoxicityRegenerated cellulose

Identifiers

PMID29616431
OpenAlexW2795465465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.