Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29616429›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological physics2018

The different faces of mass action in virus assembly.

Bart van der Holst, Willem K Kegel, Roya Zandi, Paul van der Schoot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bart van der HolstDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Willem K KegelDepartment of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roya ZandiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Riverside, Riverside, USA.
Paul van der SchootDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. p.vanderschoot@phys.tue.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-9622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spontaneous encapsulation of genomic and non-genomic polyanions by coat proteins of simple icosahedral viruses is driven, in the first instance, by electrostatic interactions with polycationic RNA binding domains on these proteins. The efficiency with which the polyanions can be encapsulated in vitro, and presumably also in vivo, must in addition be governed by the loss of translational and mixing entropy associated with co-assembly, at least if this co-assembly constitutes a reversible process. These forms of entropy counteract the impact of attractive interactions between the constituents and hence they counteract complexation. By invoking mass action-type arguments and a simple model describing electrostatic interactions, we show how these forms of entropy might settle the competition between negatively charged polymers of different molecular weights for co-assembly with the coat proteins. In direct competition, mass action turns out to strongly work against the encapsulation of RNAs that are significantly shorter, which is typically the case for non-viral (host) RNAs. We also find that coat proteins favor forming virus particles over nonspecific binding to other proteins in the cytosol even if these are present in vast excess. Our results rationalize a number of recent in vitro co-assembly experiments showing that short polyanions are less effective at attracting virus coat proteins to form virus-like particles than long ones do, even if both are present at equal weight concentrations in the assembly mixture.

Indexed as

Virus AssemblyAnimalsCapsid ProteinsParasitesThermodynamicsCapsid ProteinsCo-assemblyCompetitionLaw of mass actionOligo and polynucleotidesOverchargingParasitic binding to host proteinsVirus coat proteins

Identifiers

PMID29616429
PMCPMC5928020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.