ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2018
Phase model-based neuron stabilization into arbitrary clusters.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Control of Oscillator Networks with Mean-Field Measurement: A Hybrid Open/Closed-Loop Approach.IEEE transactions on control systems technology : a publication of the IEEE Control Systems Society · 2026Article
- Magnitude-constrained optimal chaotic desynchronization of neural populations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
- Optimal closed-loop deep brain stimulation using multiple independently controlled contacts.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Leveraging deep learning to control neural oscillators.Biological cybernetics · 2021Article
- Closed-Loop neuromodulation for clustering neuronal populations.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Analysis of neural clusters due to deep brain stimulation pulses.Biological cybernetics · 2020Article
- Optimal open-loop desynchronization of neural oscillator populations.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common method of combating pathological conditions associated with Parkinson's disease, Tourette syndrome, essential tremor, and other disorders, but whose mechanisms are not fully understood. One hypothesis, supported experimentally, is that some symptoms of these disorders are associated with pathological synchronization of neurons in the basal ganglia and thalamus. For this reason, there has been interest in recent years in finding efficient ways to desynchronize neurons that are both fast-acting and low-power. Recent results on coordinated reset and periodically forced oscillators suggest that forming distinct clusters of neurons may prove to be more effective than achieving complete desynchronization, in particular by promoting plasticity effects that might persist after stimulation is turned off. Current proposed methods for achieving clustering frequently require either multiple input sources or precomputing the control signal. We propose here a control strategy for clustering, based on an analysis of the reduced phase model for a set of identical neurons, that allows for real-time, single-input control of a population of neurons with low-amplitude, low total energy signals. After demonstrating its effectiveness on phase models, we apply it to full state models to demonstrate its validity. We also discuss the effects of coupling on the efficacy of the strategy proposed and demonstrate that the clustering can still be accomplished in the presence of weak to moderate electrotonic coupling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29616382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.