Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29616304›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Tumor metabolism assessed by FDG-PET/CT and tumor proliferation assessed by genomic grade index to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.

David Groheux, L Biard, J Lehmann-Che, L Teixeira, F A Bouhidel, B Poirot, P Bertheau, P Merlet, M Espié, M Resche-Rigon and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Repeatability ofEJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David GroheuxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France. dgroheux@yahoo.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9541-9175
L BiardDepartment of Biostatistics, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
J Lehmann-CheUniversity Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM/CNRS UMR944/7212, Paris, France.
L TeixeiraUniversity Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM/CNRS UMR944/7212, Paris, France.
F A BouhidelDepartment of Pathology, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
B PoirotMolecular Oncology Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
P BertheauDepartment of Pathology, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
P MerletDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
M EspiéUniversity Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM/CNRS UMR944/7212, Paris, France.
M Resche-RigonDepartment of Biostatistics, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
C SotiriouBreast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brusells, Belgium.
P de CremouxUniversity Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM/CNRS UMR944/7212, Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer 5697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurvival is increased when pathological complete response (pCR) is reached after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and the genomic grade index (GGI), each separately, showed good potential to predict pCR. Our study was designed to evaluate the predictive value for the therapeutic response of a combination of parameters based on FDG-PET, histoclinical features and molecular markers of proliferation.

methodsMolecular parameters were measured on pre-treatment biopsy. Tumor metabolic activity was measured using two PET/CT scans, one before and one after 2 cycles of NAC. The pCR was determined on specimen after NAC. Event-free survival (EFS) was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.

resultsOf 55 TNBC patients, 19 (35%) reached pCR after NAC. Tumor grade and Ki67 were not associated with pCR whereas GGI (P = 0.04) and its component KPNA2 (P = 0.04) showed a predictive value. The change of FDG uptake between PET

conclusionsThe early tumor metabolic change during NAC is a powerful parameter to predict pCR and outcome in TNBC patients. The GGI, determined on pretreatment biopsy, is also predictive of pCR and the combination GGI and baseline SUV

Indexed as

GenomicsNeoadjuvant TherapyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyCell ProliferationFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsEvent free survivalFDG-PET/CTGenomic grade indexNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete responseTriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID29616304
OpenAlexW2796194492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.