Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29616238›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2018

Development and validation of an automated algorithm to evaluate the abundance of bubbles in small bowel capsule endoscopy.

Olivia Pietri, Gada Rezgui, Aymeric Histace, Marine Camus, Isabelle Nion-Larmurier, Cynthia Li, Aymeric Becq, Einas Abou Ali, Olivier Romain, Ulriikka Chaput and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Olivia PietriAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Gada RezguiETIS, ENSEA, Cergy-Pontoise University, Cergy-Pontoise, France.
Aymeric HistaceETIS, ENSEA, Cergy-Pontoise University, Cergy-Pontoise, France.
Marine CamusAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Isabelle Nion-LarmurierAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Cynthia LiAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Aymeric BecqAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Einas Abou AliAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Olivier RomainETIS, ENSEA, Cergy-Pontoise University, Cergy-Pontoise, France.
Ulriikka ChaputAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Philippe MarteauAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Christian FlorentAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.
Xavier DrayAPHP Saint Antoine Hospital, Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsBubbles can impair visualization of the small bowel (SB) mucosa during capsule endoscopy (CE). We aimed to develop and validate a computed algorithm that would allow evaluation of the abundance of bubbles in SB-CE still frames. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwo sets of 200 SB-CE normal still frames were created. Two experienced SB-CE readers analyzed both sets of images twice, in a random order. Each still frame was categorized as presenting with < 10 % or ≥ 10 % of bubbles. Reproducibility (κ), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculation time were measured for different algorithms (Grey-level of co-occurrence matrix [GLCM], fractal dimension, Hough transform, and speeded-up robust features [SURF]) using the experts' analysis as reference. Algorithms with highest reproducibility, Se and Sp were then selected for a validation step on the second set of frames. Criteria for validation were κ = 1, Se ≥ 90 %, Sp ≥ 85 %, and a calculation time < 1 second.

resultsBoth SURF and GLCM algorithms had high operating points (Se and Sp over 90 %) and a perfect reproducibility (κ = 1). The validation step showed the GLCM detector strategy had the best diagnostic performances, with a Se of 95.79 %, a Sp of 95.19 %, and a calculation time of 0.037 seconds per frame.

conclusionA computed algorithm based on a GLCM detector strategy had high diagnostic performance allowing assessment of the abundance of bubbles in SB-CE still frames. This algorithm could be of interest for clinical use (quality reporting) and for research purposes (objective comparison tool of different preparations).

Identifiers

PMID29616238
PMCPMC5880035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.