Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29616202›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2018

Pediatric Critical Care in Resource-Limited Settings-Overview and Lessons Learned.

Tina M Slusher, Andrew W Kiragu, Louise T Day, Ashley R Bjorklund, Arianna Shirk, Colleen Johannsen, Scott A Hagen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Promising Vaccine Formulations for Emerging Infectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Tina M SlusherDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota and Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Andrew W KiraguDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota and Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Louise T DayLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ashley R BjorklundWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Arianna ShirkDepartment of Pediatrics AIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, Kenya.
Colleen JohannsenCardiac Intensive Care Unit of Regions Medical Center, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Scott A HagenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.
Hennepin County Medical Center · USKijabe Hospital · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRegions Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric critical care is an important component of reducing morbidity and mortality globally. Currently, pediatric critical care in low middle-income countries (LMICs) remains in its infancy in most hospitals. The majority of hospitals lack designated intensive care units, healthcare staff trained to care for critically ill children, adequate numbers of staff, and rapid access to necessary medications, supplies and equipment. In addition, most LMICs lack pediatric critical care training programs for healthcare providers or certification procedures to accredit healthcare providers working in their pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and high dependency areas. PICU can improve the quality of pediatric care in general and, if properly organized, can effectively treat the severe complications of high burden diseases, such as diarrhea, severe malaria, and respiratory distress using low-cost interventions. Setting up a PICU in a LMIC setting requires planning, specific resources, and most importantly investment in the nursing and permanent medical staff. A thoughtful approach to developing pediatric critical care services in LMICs starts with fundamental building blocks: training healthcare professionals in skills and knowledge, selecting resource appropriate effective equipment, and having supportive leadership to provide an enabling environment for appropriate care. If these fundamentals can be built on in a sustainable manner, an appropriate critical care service will be established with the potential to significantly decrease pediatric morbidity and mortality in the context of public health goals as we reach toward the sustainable development goals.

Indexed as

low middle-income countrylow resource settingspartnership practicepediatric critical carepediatric intensive care

Identifiers

PMID29616202
PMCPMC5864848
OpenAlexW2790031201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.