ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018
Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of New Wheat-
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The illusion of progress: why most introgressions from wild Triticeae fail to improve wheat agronomically.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Utilization of theMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024Review
- Tracing the Evolution of the Angiosperm Genome from the Cytogenetic Point of View.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- High-Molecular-Weight Glutenin Subunits: Genetics, Structures, and Relation to End Use Qualities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a novel wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng T3DS-5NsL•5NsS and T5DL-3DS•3DL dual translocation line with powdery mildew resistance.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Characterization, identification and evaluation of a set of wheat-Aegilops comosa chromosome lines.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an important relative of wheat (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.