Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29616062›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Complementary Evaluation of Iron Deficiency Root Responses to Assess the Effectiveness of Different Iron Foliar Applications for Chlorosis Remediation.

Marta Fuentes, Eva Bacaicoa, Mikel Rivero, Ángel M Zamarreño, José M García-Mina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta FuentesBiological and Agricultural Chemistry Group, Department of Environmental Biology, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Eva BacaicoaIden Biotechnology, Cordovilla, Spain.
Mikel RiveroNatural and Environmental Sciences Department, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ángel M ZamarreñoBiological and Agricultural Chemistry Group, Department of Environmental Biology, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
José M García-MinaBiological and Agricultural Chemistry Group, Department of Environmental Biology, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversidad Publica de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron deficiency in plants is caused by a low availability of iron in the soil, and its main visual symptom is leaf yellowing due to a decrease in chlorophyll content, along with a reduction in plant growth and fruit quality. Foliar sprays with Fe compounds are an economic alternative to the treatment with expensive synthetic Fe-chelates applied to the soil, although the efficacy of foliar treatments is rather limited. Generally, plant response to Fe-foliar treatments is monitored by measuring chlorophyll content (or related parameters as SPAD index). However, different studies have shown that foliar Fe sprays cause a local regreening and that translocation of the applied Fe within the plant is quite low. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of foliar applications of different Fe compounds [FeSO

Indexed as

chlorosisFe chelatesFe deficiencyFe(III)-chelate reductaseFe (II) transporterFe plant nutritionfoliar Fe fertilizationPM H+-ATPase

Identifiers

PMID29616062
PMCPMC5870038
OpenAlexW2791469660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.