Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615990›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

The Role of Strigolactone in the Cross-Talk Between

Piotr Rozpądek, Agnieszka M Domka, Michał Nosek, Rafał Ważny, Roman J Jędrzejczyk, Monika Wiciarz, Katarzyna Turnau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Deciphering Molecular Pathways ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Piotr RozpądekMałopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Agnieszka M DomkaInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Michał NosekInstitute of Biology, Pedagogical University of Kraków, Kraków, Poland.
Rafał WażnyMałopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Roman J JędrzejczykMałopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Monika WiciarzFaculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Katarzyna TurnauInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLUniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last years the role of fungal endophytes in plant biology has been extensively studied. A number of species were shown to positively affect plant growth and fitness, thus attempts have been made to utilize these microorganisms in agriculture and phytoremediation. Plant-fungi symbiosis requires multiple metabolic adjustments of both of the interacting organisms. The mechanisms of these adaptations are mostly unknown, however, plant hormones seem to play a central role in this process. The plant hormone strigolactone (SL) was previously shown to activate hyphae branching of mycorrhizal fungi and to negatively affect pathogenic fungi growth. Its role in the plant-endophytic fungi interaction is unknown. The effect of the synthetic SL analog GR24 on the endophytic fungi

Indexed as

Arabidopsis thalianafungal endophytesjasmonic acidsalicylic acidstrigolactonesymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29615990
PMCPMC5867299
OpenAlexW2791274613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.