Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615914›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Exposure to Alumina Nanoparticles in Female Mice During Pregnancy Induces Neurodevelopmental Toxicity in the Offspring.

Qinli Zhang, Yong Ding, Kaihong He, Huan Li, Fuping Gao, Taylor J Moehling, Xiaohong Wu, Jeremy Duncan, Qiao Niu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Therapeutic nanoparticle safety in pregnancy: Bridging knowledge gaps with environmental insights and a translational roadmap.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exposure to two-dimensional ultrathin TiJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neurotoxicology of Nanomaterials.Chemical research in toxicology · 2020
    Review
  19. Neurotoxicity of e-cigarettes.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qinli ZhangDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yong DingDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Kaihong HeDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Huan LiDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Fuping GaoKey Laboratory for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Taylor J MoehlingDepartment of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States.
Xiaohong WuDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Jeremy DuncanDepartment of Physiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States.
Qiao NiuDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Shanxi Medical University · CNJackson Memorial Hospital · USInstitute of High Energy Physics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alumina nanoparticles (AlNP) have been shown to accumulate in organs and penetrate biological barriers which lead to toxic effects in many organ systems. However, it is not known whether AlNP exposure to female mice during pregnancy can affect the development of the central nervous system or induce neurodevelopmental toxicity in the offspring. The present study aims to examine the effect of AlNP on neurodevelopment and associated underlying mechanism. ICR strain adult female mice were randomly divided into four groups, which were treated with normal saline (control), 10 μm particle size of alumina (bulk-Al), and 50 and 13 nm AlNP during entire pregnancy period. Aluminum contents in the hippocampus of newborns were measured and neurodevelopmental behaviors were tracked in the offspring from birth to 1 month of age. Furthermore, oxidative stress and neurotransmitter levels were measured in the cerebral cortex of the adolescents. Our results showed that aluminum contents in the hippocampus of newborns in AlNP-treated groups were significantly higher than those in bulk-Al and controls. Moreover, the offspring delivered by AlNP-treated female mice displayed stunted neurodevelopmental behaviors. Finally, the offspring of AlNP-treated mice demonstrated significantly increased anxiety-like behavior with impaired learning and memory performance at 1 month of age. The underlying mechanism could be related to increased oxidative stress and decreased neurotransmitter levels in the cerebral cortex. We therefore conclude that AlNP exposure of female mice during pregnancy can induce neurodevelopmental toxicity in offspring.

Indexed as

alumina nanoparticlesdevelopmental neurotoxicityneurodevelopmental toxicityneurotransmitteroxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID29615914
PMCPMC5869208
OpenAlexW2793994192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.