Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615902›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Drug Repositioning in Glioblastoma: A Pathway Perspective.

Sze Kiat Tan, Anna Jermakowicz, Adnan K Mookhtiar, Charles B Nemeroff, Stephan C Schürer, Nagi G Ayad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Two faces of Amitriptyline in anMolecular and clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sze Kiat TanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Therapeutic Innovation, Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Brain Tumor Initiative, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Anna JermakowiczDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Therapeutic Innovation, Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Brain Tumor Initiative, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Adnan K MookhtiarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Therapeutic Innovation, Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Brain Tumor Initiative, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Charles B NemeroffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Center on Aging, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Stephan C SchürerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Computational Sciences, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Nagi G AyadDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Therapeutic Innovation, Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Brain Tumor Initiative, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant primary adult brain tumor. The current standard of care is surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy treatment, which extends life in most cases. Unfortunately, tumor recurrence is nearly universal and patients with recurrent glioblastoma typically survive <1 year. Therefore, new therapies and therapeutic combinations need to be developed that can be quickly approved for use in patients. However, in order to gain approval, therapies need to be safe as well as effective. One possible means of attaining rapid approval is repurposing FDA approved compounds for GBM therapy. However, candidate compounds must be able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and therefore a selection process has to be implemented to identify such compounds that can eliminate GBM tumor expansion. We review here psychiatric and non-psychiatric compounds that may be effective in GBM, as well as potential drugs targeting cell death pathways. We also discuss the potential of data-driven computational approaches to identify compounds that induce cell death in GBM cells, enabled by large reference databases such as the Library of Integrated Network Cell Signatures (LINCS). Finally, we argue that identifying pathways dysregulated in GBM in a patient specific manner is essential for effective repurposing in GBM and other gliomas.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrierdrug repurposingglioblastomaLibrary of Integrated Network Based Cell SignaturesLINCS

Identifiers

PMID29615902
PMCPMC5864870
OpenAlexW2793742848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.