Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615749›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Blocking distinct interactions between Glioblastoma cells and their tissue microenvironment: A novel multi-targeted therapeutic approach.

Melanie Mettang, Viola Meyer-Pannwitt, Georg Karpel-Massler, Shaoxia Zhou, Neil O Carragher, Karl Josef Föhr, Bernd Baumann, Lisa Nonnenmacher, Stefanie Enzenmüller, Meike Dahlhaus and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unraveling the intricate link between cell death and neuroinflammation usingFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Mechanisms of Treatment Resistance in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Collective invasion of glioma cells through OCT1 signalling and interaction with reactive astrocytes after surgery.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Melanie MettangDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Viola Meyer-PannwittDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Georg Karpel-MasslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Shaoxia ZhouDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Neil O CarragherEdinburgh Cancer Research Center UK, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Karl Josef FöhrDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0116-6750
Bernd BaumannInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Lisa NonnenmacherDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Stefanie EnzenmüllerDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Meike DahlhausDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Markus D SiegelinDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sebastien StrohDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel MertensDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Pamela Fischer-PosovszkyDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
E Marion SchneiderDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Marc-Eric HalatschDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Klaus-Michael DebatinDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Mike-Andrew WesthoffDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany. andrew.westhoff@uniklinik-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3256-7100
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USEdinburgh Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the highly invasive nature of Glioblastoma (GB), complete surgical resection is not feasible, while motile tumour cells are often associated with several specific brain structures that enhance treatment-resistance. Here, we investigate the therapeutic potential of Disulfiram and Carbenoxolone, that inhibit two distinct interactions between GB and the brain tissue microenvironment: stress-induced cell-matrix adhesion and gap junction mediated cell-cell communication, respectively. Increase in cell numbers of tumour-initiating cells, which are cultured in suspension as cell clusters, and adherent differentiated cells can be blocked to a similar extent by Carbenoxolone, as both cell populations form gap junctions, but the adherent differentiated cells are much more sensitive to Disulfiram treatment, which - via modulation of NF-κB signalling - interferes with cell-substrate adhesion. Interestingly, inducing adhesion in tumour-initiating cells without differentiating them does not sensitize for Disulfiram. Importantly, combining Disulfiram, Carbenoxolone and the standard chemotherapeutic drug Temozolomide reduces tumour size in an orthotopic mouse model. Isolating GB cells from their direct environment within the brain represents an important addition to current therapeutic approaches. The blockage of cellular interactions via the clinically relevant substances Disulfiram and Carbenoxolone, has distinct effects on different cell populations within a tumour, potentially reducing motility and/or resistance to apoptosis.

Indexed as

Acetaldehyde Dehydrogenase InhibitorsAnimalsAnti-Ulcer AgentsApoptosisBrain NeoplasmsCarbenoxoloneCell AdhesionCell ProliferationDisulfiramDrug Therapy, CombinationGene Expression ProfilingGlioblastomaHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDAcetaldehyde Dehydrogenase InhibitorsAnti-Ulcer AgentsCarbenoxoloneDisulfiram

Identifiers

PMID29615749
PMCPMC5882900
OpenAlexW2801311014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.