Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615719›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

State-dependent representation of stimulus-evoked activity in high-density recordings of neural cultures.

Thierry Nieus, Valeria D'Andrea, Hayder Amin, Stefano Di Marco, Houman Safaai, Alessandro Maccione, Luca Berdondini, Stefano Panzeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. iScience · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thierry NieusNetS3 Laboratory, Neuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy. thierry.nieus@unimi.it.
Valeria D'AndreaNeural Computation Laboratory, Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems @UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-5374
Hayder AminNetS3 Laboratory, Neuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
Stefano Di MarcoNetS3 Laboratory, Neuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-6270
Houman SafaaiNeural Computation Laboratory, Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems @UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-7397
Alessandro MaccioneNetS3 Laboratory, Neuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
Luca BerdondiniNetS3 Laboratory, Neuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-2812
Stefano PanzeriNeural Computation Laboratory, Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems @UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy. stefano.panzeri@iit.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-8909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal responses to external stimuli vary from trial to trial partly because they depend on continuous spontaneous variations of the state of neural circuits, reflected in variations of ongoing activity prior to stimulus presentation. Understanding how post-stimulus responses relate to the pre-stimulus spontaneous activity is thus important to understand how state dependence affects information processing and neural coding, and how state variations can be discounted to better decode single-trial neural responses. Here we exploited high-resolution CMOS electrode arrays to record simultaneously from thousands of electrodes in in-vitro cultures stimulated at specific sites. We used information-theoretic analyses to study how ongoing activity affects the information that neuronal responses carry about the location of the stimuli. We found that responses exhibited state dependence on the time between the last spontaneous burst and the stimulus presentation and that the dependence could be described with a linear model. Importantly, we found that a small number of selected neurons carry most of the stimulus information and contribute to the state-dependent information gain. This suggests that a major value of large-scale recording is that it individuates the small subset of neurons that carry most information and that benefit the most from knowledge of its state dependence.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationOxidesSemiconductorsAnimalsCells, CulturedElectrodesElectrophysiologyHippocampusLinear ModelsMetalsNeuronsNorepinephrineRatsMetalsNorepinephrineOxides

Identifiers

PMID29615719
PMCPMC5882875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.