ReviewJournal of developmental biology2017
Engineering the Drosophila Genome for Developmental Biology.
Review in Journal of developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly frequent undesired insertional mutagenesis during Drosophila genome editing.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Whole Animal Feeding FLat (WAFFL): a complete and comprehensive validation of a novel, high-throughput fly experimentation system.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Serial Recombineering Cloning to Build Selectable and Tagged Genomic P[acman] BAC Clones for Selection Transgenesis and Functional Gene Analysis using Drosophila melanogaster.Current protocols · 2023Article
- Article
- Precise genome engineering inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Roles ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Combined use of feature engineering and machine-learning to predict essential genes inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Characterisation of protein isoforms encoded by the Drosophila Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 gene shaggy.PloS one · 2020Article
- Gene Knock-Ins inGenetics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent development of transposon and CRISPR-Cas9-based tools for manipulating the fly genome in vivo promises tremendous progress in our ability to study developmental processes. Tools for introducing tags into genes at their endogenous genomic loci facilitate imaging or biochemistry approaches at the cellular or subcellular levels. Similarly, the ability to make specific alterations to the genome sequence allows much more precise genetic control to address questions of gene function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.