Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615512›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Philip Carella, Anna Gogleva, Marta Tomaselli, Carolin Alfs, Sebastian Schornack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Plant-fungi interactions inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Dynamic Interaction between Oil Palm andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip CarellaSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB2 1LR Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anna GoglevaSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB2 1LR Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Marta TomaselliSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB2 1LR Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Carolin AlfsSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB2 1LR Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sebastian SchornackSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB2 1LR Cambridge, United Kingdom sebastian.schornack@slcu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7836-5881

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014130/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expansion of plants onto land was a formative event that brought forth profound changes to the earth's geochemistry and biota. Filamentous eukaryotic microbes developed the ability to colonize plant tissues early during the evolution of land plants, as demonstrated by intimate, symbiosis-like associations in >400 million-year-old fossils. However, the degree to which filamentous microbes establish pathogenic interactions with early divergent land plants is unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the broad host-range oomycete pathogen

Indexed as

HyphaeMarchantiaPhytophthoraPlant DiseasesSymbiosisbryophytehaustorialiverwortsoomycetesPhytophthora

Identifiers

PMID29615512
PMCPMC5910834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.