Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615484›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

The Synaptic Properties of Cells Define the Hallmarks of Interval Timing in a Recurrent Neural Network.

Oswaldo Pérez, Hugo Merchant

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pre-supplementary Motor Cortex Mediates Learning Transfer from Perceptual to Motor Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Neurocomputational Models of Interval Timing: Seeing the Forest for the Trees.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  6. A Second Introduction to the Neurobiology of Interval Timing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The neural bases for timing of durations.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Mapping between sound, brain and behaviour: four-level framework for understanding rhythm processing in humans and non-human primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Understanding the computation of time using neural network models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Why Do Durations in Musical Rhythms Conform to Small Integer Ratios?Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Oswaldo PérezInstitute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Queretaro 76230, México hugomerchant@unam.mx doswaldo.perezm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1888-7434
Hugo MerchantInstitute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Queretaro 76230, México hugomerchant@unam.mx doswaldo.perezm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3488-9501
Autonomous University of Queretaro · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive research has described two key features of interval timing. The bias property is associated with accuracy and implies that time is overestimated for short intervals and underestimated for long intervals. The scalar property is linked to precision and states that the variability of interval estimates increases as a function of interval duration. The neural mechanisms behind these properties are not well understood. Here we implemented a recurrent neural network that mimics a cortical ensemble and includes cells that show paired-pulse facilitation and slow inhibitory synaptic currents. The network produces interval selective responses and reproduces both bias and scalar properties when a Bayesian decoder reads its activity. Notably, the interval-selectivity, timing accuracy, and precision of the network showed complex changes as a function of the decay time constants of the modeled synaptic properties and the level of background activity of the cells. These findings suggest that physiological values of the time constants for paired-pulse facilitation and GABAb, as well as the internal state of the network, determine the bias and scalar properties of interval timing.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSynaptic TransmissionAnimalsGABAergic NeuronsHumansNerve NetReaction Timeinterval timinglong-term synaptic propertiesrecurrent neural networkspontaneous activity

Identifiers

PMID29615484
PMCPMC6596027
OpenAlexW2795592222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.