Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615444›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Home interventions and light therapy for the treatment of vitiligo (HI-Light Vitiligo Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Rachel H Haines, Kim S Thomas, Alan A Montgomery, Jane C Ravenscroft, Perways Akram, Joanne R Chalmers, Diane Whitham, Lelia Duley, Viktoria Eleftheriadou, Garry Meakin and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Home phototherapy for patients with vitiligo: challenges and solutions.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel H HainesNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7924-0602
Kim S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7785-7465
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Jane C RavenscroftDepartment of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Perways AkramDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Joanne R ChalmersCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Diane WhithamNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Lelia DuleyNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Viktoria EleftheriadouCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Garry MeakinNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Eleanor J MitchellNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Jennifer WhiteNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Andy RogersDepartment of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Tracey SachNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Miriam SanterPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-5260
Wei TanNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Trish HepburnNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Hywel C WilliamsCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jonathan BatchelorCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/12/24/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVitiligo is a condition resulting in white patches on the skin. People with vitiligo can suffer from low self-esteem, psychological disturbance and diminished quality of life. Vitiligo is often poorly managed, partly due to lack of high-quality evidence to inform clinical care. We describe here a large, independent, randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the comparative effectiveness of potent topical corticosteroid, home-based hand-held narrowband ultraviolet B-light (NB-UVB) or combination of the two, for the management of vitiligo. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The HI-Light Vitiligo Trial is a multicentre, three-arm, parallel group, pragmatic, placebo-controlled RCT. 516 adults and children with actively spreading, but limited, vitiligo are randomised (1:1:1) to one of three groups: mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment plus dummy NB-UVB light, vehicle ointment plus NB-UVB light or mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment plus NB-UVB light. Treatment of up to three patches of vitiligo is continued for up to 9 months with clinic visits at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months and four post-treatment questionnaires.The HI-Light Vitiligo Trial assesses outcomes included in the vitiligo core outcome set and places emphasis on participants' views of treatment success. The primary outcome is proportion of participants achieving treatment success (patient-rated Vitiligo Noticeability Scale) for a target patch of vitiligo at 9 months with further independent blinded assessment using digital images of the target lesion before and after treatment. Secondary outcomes include time to onset of treatment response, treatment success by body region, percentage repigmentation, quality of life, time-burden of treatment, maintenance of response, safety and within-trial cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approvals were granted by East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (14/EM/1173) and the MHRA (EudraCT 2014-003473-42). The trial was registered 8 January 2015 ISRCTN (17160087). Results will be published in full as open access in the NIHR Journal library and elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17160087.

Indexed as

PhototherapyUltraviolet TherapyAdultChildDermatologic AgentsFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansQuality of LifeResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeVitiligoDermatologic Agentscombination therapyNB-UVBpragmaticrandomised controlled trialtopical corticosteroidvitiligo

Identifiers

PMID29615444
PMCPMC5893933
OpenAlexW2780049904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.