Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615396›Full record

ArticleBMJ evidence-based medicine2018

Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development.

Sietse Wieringa, Dunja Dreesens, Frode Forland, Carel Hulshof, Sue Lukersmith, Fergus Macbeth, Beth Shaw, Arlène van Vliet, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, AID Knowledge Working Group of the Guidelines International Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ evidence-based medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sietse WieringaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-8493
Dunja DreesensSchool CAPHRI, department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frode ForlandDivision for Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Carel HulshofCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sue LukersmithResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Australia.
Fergus MacbethCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Beth ShawNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
Arlène van VlietLeiden University Medical Center/Dutch Working Party on Infection Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Teun Zuiderent-JerakDepartment of Thematic Studies - Technology and social change, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
AID Knowledge Working Group of the Guidelines International Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansJudgmentRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29615396
PMCPMC5969373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.