Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29615276›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[CR-POSSUM and Surgical Apgar Score as predictive factors for patients' allocation after colorectal surgery].

Sílvia Pinho, Filipa Lagarto, Blandina Gomes, Liliana Costa, Catarina S Nunes, Carla Oliveira

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sílvia PinhoCentro Hospitalar do Porto, Serviço de Anestesiologia, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: silviaabpinho@gmail.com.
Filipa LagartoCentro Hospitalar do Porto, Serviço de Anestesiologia, Porto, Portugal.
Blandina GomesCentro Hospitalar do Porto, Serviço de Anestesiologia, Porto, Portugal.
Liliana CostaCentro Hospitalar do Porto, Serviço de Anestesiologia, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina S NunesUniversidade Aberta, Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia, Laboratório Associado de Energia Transportes e Aeronáutica, Porto, Portugal; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Centro de Investigação Clínica em Anestesiologia, Porto, Portugal.
Carla OliveiraCentro Hospitalar do Porto, Serviço de Anestesiologia, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSurgical patients frequently require admission in high-dependency units or intensive care units. Resources are scarce and there are no universally accepted admission criteria, so patients' allocation must be optimized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between postoperative destination of patients submitted to colorectal surgery and the scores ColoRectal Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (CR-POSSUM) and Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) and, secondarily find cut-offs to aid this allocation.

methodsA cross-sectional prospective observational study, including all adult patients undergoing colorectal surgery during a 2 years period. Data collected from the electronic clinical process and anesthesia records.

resultsA total of 358 patients were included. Median score for SAS was 8 and CR-POSSUM had a median mortality probability of 4.5%. Immediate admission on high-dependency units/intensive care units occurred in 51 patients and late admission in 18. Scores from ward and high-dependency units/intensive care units patients were statistically different (SAS: 8 vs. 7, p<0.001; CR-POSSUM: 4.4% vs. 15.9%, p<0.001). Both scores were found to be predictors of immediate postoperative destination (p<0.001). Concerning immediate high-dependency units/intensive care units admission, CR-POSSUM showed a strong association (AUC 0.78, p=0.034) with a ≥9.16 cut-off point (sensitivity: 62.5%; specificity: 75.2%), outperforming SAS (AUC 0.67, p=0.048), with a ≤7 cut-off point (sensitivity: 67.3%; specificity: 56.1%).

conclusionsBoth CR-POSSUM and SAS were associated with the clinical decision to admit a patient to the high-dependency units/intensive care units immediately after surgery. CR-POSSUM alone showed a better discriminative capacity.

Indexed as

ApgarCR‐POSSUMIntensive carePostoperative triageTerapia intensivaTriagem pós‐operatória

Identifiers

PMID29615276
PMCPMC9391801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.