Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614995›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2018

Racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children: a systematic, comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Marion Eberlin, Min Chen, Tobias Mueck, Jan Däbritz

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Racecadotril for acute diarrhoea in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intestinal secretory mechanisms and diarrhea.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Approach to diarrhoeal disorders in children.Singapore medical journal · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Acute Infectious Gastroenteritis in Infancy and Childhood.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marion EberlinDepartment of Medical Affairs CHC GSA, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Min ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Tobias MueckDepartment of Medical Affairs CHC GSA, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jan DäbritzDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany. Jan.Daebritz@med.uni-rostock.de.
Sanofi (Germany) · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEWuhan Union Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacecadotril is a guideline-recommended option for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children but existing guidelines and previous reviews of the field are based on a small fraction of published evidence. Therefore, we have performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials evaluating racecadotril as add-on or in comparison to other treatments.

methodsA search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar without limits about country of origin or reporting language. A meta-analysis was conducted for the five most frequently used efficacy parameters.

resultsWe have retrieved 58 trials, from nine countries including six in comparison to placebo, 15 in comparison to various active treatments and 41 as add-on to various standard treatments (some multi-armed studies allowing more than one comparison). Trials used 45 distinct efficacy parameters, most often time to cure, % of cured children after 3 days of treatment, global efficacy and number of stools on second day of treatment. Racecadotril was superior to comparator treatments in outpatients and hospitalized patients with a high degree of consistency as confirmed by meta-analysis for the five most frequently used outcome parameters. For instance, it reduced time to cure from 106.2 h to 78.2 h (mean reduction 28.0 h; P < 0.0001 in 24 studies reporting on this parameter). Tolerability of racecadotril was comparable to that of placebo (10.4% vs. 10.6% adverse events incidence) or that of active comparator treatments other than loperamide (2.4% in both groups).

conclusionsBased on a comprehensive review of the existing evidence, we conclude that racecadotril is more efficacious than other treatments except for loperamide and has a tolerability similar to placebo and better than loperamide. These findings support the use of racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAntidiarrhealsChildDiarrheaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThiorphanAntidiarrhealsracecadotrilThiorphanChildrenDiarrheaLoperamideMeta-analysisProbioticRacecadotrilSmectite

Identifiers

PMID29614995
PMCPMC5883268
OpenAlexW2801326723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.