ArticleBMC ophthalmology2018
Theme trends and knowledge structure on choroidal neovascularization: a quantitative and co-word analysis.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Telemedicine Research Trends in 2001-2022 and Research Cooperation Between China and Other Countries Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Bibliometric Analysis.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Research hotspots and theme trends in post-traumatic growth: A co-word analysis based on keywords.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Review
- A comprehensive overview of cellular senescence from 1990 to 2021: A machine learning-based bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Effects of Photobiomodulation on Oral Mucositis: Visualization and Analysis of Knowledge.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Global Trends in Research on Cell-Free Nucleic Acids in Obstetrics and Gynecology during 2017-2021.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Medical Sociology: A Co-Word Analysis.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Article
- Connections and Biases in Health Equity and Culture Research: A Semantic Network Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Tumor Immunotherapy Studies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe distribution pattern and knowledge structure of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) was surveyed based on literatures in PubMed.
methodsPublished scientific papers about CNV were retrieved from Jan 1st, 2012 to May 31st, 2017. Extracted MeSH terms were analyzed quantitatively by using Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB) and high-frequency MeSH terms were identified. Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted by SPSS 19.0 according to the MeSH term-source article matrix. High-frequency MeSH terms co-occurrence matrix was constructed to support strategic diagram and social network analysis (SNA).
resultsAccording to the searching strategy, all together 2366 papers were included, and the number of annual papers changed slightly from Jan 1st, 2012 to May 31st, 2017. Among all the extracted MeSH terms, 44 high-frequency MeSH terms were identified and hotspots were clustered into 6 categories. In the strategic diagram, clinical drug therapy, pathology and diagnosis related researches of CNV were well developed. In contrast, the metabolism, etiology, complications, prevention and control of CNV in animal models, and genetics related researches of CNV were relatively immature, which offers potential research space for future study. As for the SNA result, the position status of each component was described by the centrality values.
conclusionsThe studies on CNV are relatively divergent and the 6 research categories concluded from this study could reflect the publication trends on CNV to some extent. By providing a quantitative bibliometric research across a 5-year span, it could help to depict an overall command of the latest topics and provide some hints for researchers when launching new projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.