Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614958›Full record

ArticleBMC developmental biology2018

The skeletal ontogeny of Astatotilapia burtoni - a direct-developing model system for the evolution and development of the teleost body plan.

Joost M Woltering, Michaela Holzem, Ralf F Schneider, Vasilios Nanos, Axel Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spiny and soft-rayed fin domains in acanthomorph fish are established through a BMP-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joost M WolteringChair in Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457, Constance, Germany. joost.woltering@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2630-6572
Michaela HolzemChair in Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457, Constance, Germany.
Ralf F SchneiderChair in Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457, Constance, Germany.
Vasilios NanosChair in Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457, Constance, Germany.
Axel MeyerChair in Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457, Constance, Germany. axel.meyer@uni-konstanz.de.

Funding

European Research Council 293700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experimental approach to the evolution and development of the vertebrate skeleton has to a large extent relied on "direct-developing" amniote model organisms, such as the mouse and the chicken. These organisms can however only be partially informative where it concerns secondarily lost features or anatomical novelties not present in their lineages. The widely used anamniotes Xenopus and zebrafish are "indirect-developing" organisms that proceed through an extended time as free-living larvae, before adopting many aspects of their adult morphology, complicating experiments at these stages, and increasing the risk for lethal pleiotropic effects using genetic strategies.

resultsHere, we provide a detailed description of the development of the osteology of the African mouthbrooding cichlid Astatotilapia burtoni, primarily focusing on the trunk (spinal column, ribs and epicentrals) and the appendicular skeleton (pectoral, pelvic, dorsal, anal, caudal fins and scales), and to a lesser extent on the cranium. We show that this species has an extremely "direct" mode of development, attains an adult body plan within 2 weeks after fertilization while living off its yolk supply only, and does not pass through a prolonged larval period.

conclusionsAs husbandry of this species is easy, generation time is short, and the species is amenable to genetic targeting strategies through microinjection, we suggest that the use of this direct-developing cichlid will provide a valuable model system for the study of the vertebrate body plan, particularly where it concerns the evolution and development of fish or teleost specific traits. Based on our results we comment on the development of the homocercal caudal fin, on shared ontogenetic patterns between pectoral and pelvic girdles, and on the evolution of fin spines as novelty in acanthomorph fishes. We discuss the differences between "direct" and "indirect" developing actinopterygians using a comparison between zebrafish and A. burtoni development.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimal FinsAnimalsAnimal ScalesBiological EvolutionBone and BonesCichlidsEmbryonic DevelopmentOsteogenesisAppendicular skeletonAstatotilapia burtoniAxial skeletonDirect-developmentEmbryonic developmentEvo-devoFinIndirect-developmentTeleost

Identifiers

PMID29614958
PMCPMC5883283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.