Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614957›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2018

Naturally occurring variations in the nod-independent model legume Aeschynomene evenia and relatives: a resource for nodulation genetics.

Clémence Chaintreuil, Xavier Perrier, Guillaume Martin, Joël Fardoux, Gwilym P Lewis, Laurent Brottier, Ronan Rivallan, Mario Gomez-Pacheco, Mickaël Bourges, Léo Lamy and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Clémence ChaintreuilIRD, Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, UMR LSTM, Campus International de Baillarguet, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Xavier PerrierCIRAD, Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes Méditerranéennes et Tropicales, UMR AGAP, Campus de Lavalette, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Guillaume MartinCIRAD, Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes Méditerranéennes et Tropicales, UMR AGAP, Campus de Lavalette, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Joël FardouxIRD, Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, UMR LSTM, Campus International de Baillarguet, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Gwilym P LewisComparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK.
Laurent BrottierIRD, Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, UMR LSTM, Campus International de Baillarguet, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Ronan RivallanCIRAD, Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes Méditerranéennes et Tropicales, UMR AGAP, Campus de Lavalette, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Mario Gomez-PachecoInstitute of Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud. Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Mickaël BourgesInstitute of Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud. Université Paris-Saclay, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Léo LamyIRD, Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, UMR LSTM, Campus International de Baillarguet, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Béatrice ThibaudCIRAD, Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes Méditerranéennes et Tropicales, UMR AGAP, Campus de Lavalette, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Heriniaina RamanankieranaLaboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement/Centre National de Recherche sur l'Environnement, 101, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Herizo RandriambanonaLaboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement/Centre National de Recherche sur l'Environnement, 101, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Hervé VandrotIAC, Laboratoire de Botanique et d'Ecologie Végétale Appliquée, UMR AMAP, 98825 Pouembout, Nouvelle-Calédonie, France.
Pierre MournetCIRAD, Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes Méditerranéennes et Tropicales, UMR AGAP, Campus de Lavalette, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Eric GiraudIRD, Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, UMR LSTM, Campus International de Baillarguet, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Jean-François ArrighiIRD, Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, UMR LSTM, Campus International de Baillarguet, F-34398, Montpellier, France. jean-francois.arrighi@ird.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-2066
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRCentre National de Recherches sur l'Environnement · MGUniversité Paris-Sud · FRRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GB

Funding

ANR ANR-AeschyNod-14-CE19-0005-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong semi-aquatic species of the legume genus Aeschynomene, some have the unique property of being root and stem-nodulated by photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium lacking the nodABC genes necessary for the production of Nod factors. These species provide an excellent biological system with which to explore the evolution of nodulation in legumes. Among them, Aeschynomene evenia has emerged as a model legume to undertake the genetic dissection of the so-called Nod-independent symbiosis. In addition to the genetic analysis of nodulation on a reference line, natural variation in a germplasm collection could also be surveyed to uncover genetic determinants of nodulation. To this aim, we investigated the patterns of genetic diversity in a collection of 226 Nod-independent Aeschynomene accessions.

resultsA combination of phylogenetic analyses, comprising ITS and low-copy nuclear genes, along with cytogenetic experiments and artificial hybridizations revealed the richness of the Nod-independent Aeschynomene group with the identification of 13 diploid and 6 polyploid well-differentiated taxa. A set of 54 SSRs was used to further delineate taxon boundaries and to identify different genotypes. Patterns of microsatellite diversity also illuminated the genetic basis of the Aeschynomene taxa that were all found to be predominantly autogamous and with a predicted simple disomic inheritance, two attributes favorable for genetics. In addition, taxa displaying a pronounced genetic diversity, notably A. evenia, A. indica and A. sensitiva, were characterized by a clear geographically-based genetic structure and variations in root and stem nodulation.

conclusionA well-characterized germplasm collection now exists as a major genetic resource to thoroughly explore the natural variation of nodulation in response to different bradyrhizobial strains. Symbiotic polymorphisms are expected to be found notably in the induction of nodulation, in nitrogen fixation and also in stem nodulation. Subsequent genetic analysis and locus mapping will pave the way for the identification of the underlying genes through forward or reverse genetics. Such discoveries will significantly contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning how some Aeschynomene species can be efficiently nodulated in a Nod-independent fashion.

Indexed as

BradyrhizobiumDiploidyFabaceaeGenome, PlantGenotypePloidiesPolyploidySymbiosisAeschynomeneDiversityGenotypeLegumeNodulationPloidySpeciesSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29614957
PMCPMC5883870
OpenAlexW2804317271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.