Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614779›Full record

ReviewViruses2018

Advances in HIV-1 Vaccine Development.

Yong Gao, Paul F McKay, Jamie F S Mann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. CD4Vaccines · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yong GaoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada. ygao387@uwo.ca.
Paul F McKayImperial College London, Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Medicine, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK. p.mckay@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5195-6254
Jamie F S MannDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada. jmann62@uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7037-1286

Funding

Resource for Biocomputing Visualization and InformaticsP41GM103311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2012 to 2017
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An efficacious HIV-1 vaccine is regarded as the best way to halt the ongoing HIV-1 epidemic. However, despite significant efforts to develop a safe and effective vaccine, the modestly protective RV144 trial remains the only efficacy trial to provide some level of protection against HIV-1 acquisition. This review will outline the history of HIV vaccine development, novel technologies being applied to HIV vaccinology and immunogen design, as well as the studies that are ongoing to advance our understanding of vaccine-induced immune correlates of protection.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineOutcome Assessment, Health CareStructure-Activity RelationshipVaccinationViral ProteinsAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV AntibodiesViral ProteinsantibodiesHIV-1immunogenneutralizationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID29614779
PMCPMC5923461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.