Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614265›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2018

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of combination-chemotherapy for lung cancer.

Louis T Curtis, Victor H van Berkel, Hermann B Frieboes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hybrid modeling frameworks of tumor development and treatment.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louis T CurtisDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Lutz Hall 419, Louisville, KY 40208, USA.
Victor H van BerkelDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville, KY, USA; James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, KY, USA.
Hermann B FrieboesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Lutz Hall 419, Louisville, KY 40208, USA; James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, KY, USA; Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: hbfrie01@louisville.edu.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Integrated framework to predict chemotherapy response post lung tumor resectionR15CA203605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FRIEBOES, HERMANN · 2016 to 2016
$462k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA203605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically involves a doublet regimen for a number of cycles. For any particular patient, a course of treatment is usually chosen from a large number of combinational protocols with drugs in concomitant or sequential administration. In spite of newer drugs and protocols, half of patients with early disease will live less than five years and 95% of those with advanced disease survive for less than one year. Here, we apply mathematical modeling to simulate tumor response to multiple drug regimens, with the capability to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as well as metronomic drug administration. We couple pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic intracellular multi-compartment models with a model of vascularized tumor growth, setting input parameters from in vitro data, and using the models to project potential response in vivo. This represents an initial step towards the development of a comprehensive virtual system to evaluate tumor response to combinatorial drug regimens, with the goal to more efficiently identify optimal course of treatment with patient tumor-specific data. We evaluate cisplatin and gemcitabine with clinically-relevant dosages, and simulate four treatment NSCLC scenarios combining MTD and metronomic therapy. This work thus establishes a framework for systematic evaluation of tumor response to combination chemotherapy. The results with the chosen parameter set indicate that although a metronomic regimen may provide advantage over MTD, the combination of these regimens may not necessarily offer improved response. Future model evaluation of chemotherapy possibilities may help to assess their potential value to obtain sustained NSCLC regression for particular patients, with the ultimate goal of optimizing multiple-drug chemotherapy regimens in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdministration, MetronomicCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCisplatinComputer SimulationDeoxycytidineDrug Therapy, CombinationGemcitabineHumansLung NeoplasmsMaximum Tolerated DosePharmacokineticsCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineCombination chemotherapyGemcitabine and cisplatinLung cancerMathematical modeling and computational simulationPharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID29614265
PMCPMC5958901
OpenAlexW2800305444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.