Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614236›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Identifying Barriers to Collaboration Between Primary Care and Public Health: Experiences at the Local Level.

Rebekah Pratt, Beth Gyllstrom, Kim Gearin, Carol Lange, David Hahn, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Lisa VanRaemdonck, Don Nease, Susan Zahner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebekah Pratt1 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3561-8276
Beth Gyllstrom2 Center for Public Health Practice, Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Kim Gearin2 Center for Public Health Practice, Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Carol Lange1 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David Hahn3 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Laura-Mae Baldwin4 Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lisa VanRaemdonck5 School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Don Nease6 Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Susan Zahner7 School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInterest is increasing in collaborations between public health and primary care to address the health of a community. Although the understanding of how these collaborations work is growing, little is known about the barriers facing these partners at the local level. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to collaboration between primary care and public health at the local level in 4 states.

methodsThe study team, which comprised 12 representatives of Practice-Based Research Networks (networks of practitioners interested in conducting research in practice-based settings), identified 40 key informants from the public health and primary care fields in Colorado, Minnesota, Washington State, and Wisconsin. The key informants participated in standardized, semistructured telephone interviews with 8 study team members in 2014 and 2015. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analyzed key themes and subthemes by drawing on grounded theory.

resultsPrimary care and public health participants identified similar barriers to collaboration. Barriers at the institutional level included the challenges of the primary care environment, in which providers feel overwhelmed and resources are tight; the need for systems change; a lack of partnership; and geographic challenges. Barriers to collaboration included mutual awareness, communication, data sharing, capacity, lack of resources, and prioritization of resources.

conclusionsSome barriers to collaboration (eg, changes to health care billing, demands on provider time) require systems change to overcome, whereas others (eg, a lack of shared priorities and mutual awareness) could be addressed through educational approaches, without adding resources or making a systemic change. Overcoming these common barriers may lead to more effective collaboration.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPublic HealthAwarenessDelivery of Health CareGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchTime FactorsUnited Statesbarriersintegrationprimary carepublic healthqualitative

Identifiers

PMID29614236
PMCPMC5958390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.