Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614105›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Evaluating pre-pregnancy dietary diversity vs. dietary quality scores as predictors of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Selma Kronsteiner-Gicevic, Audrey J Gaskins, Teresa T Fung, Bernard Rosner, Deirdre K Tobias, Sheila Isanaka, Walter C Willett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Selma Kronsteiner-GicevicDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-8671
Audrey J GaskinsDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Teresa T FungDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Bernard RosnerChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Deirdre K TobiasDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sheila IsanakaDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Walter C WillettDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Life Course Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in WomenUM1CA176726 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI WILLETT, WALTER C. · 2013 to 2017
$15.7M
Metabolomics and type 2 diabetes risk among high-risk women with a history of gestational diabetesK01DK103720 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TOBIAS, DEIRDRE KAY · 2014 to 2016
$396k
Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Early Pregnancy OutcomesK99ES026648 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GASKINS, AUDREY JANE · 2017 to 2018
$246k
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA176726NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK103720NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES026648NIH HHS K01DK103720-01NIH HHS K99ES026648NIH HHS UM1 CA176726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary diversity scores (DDS) are considered as metrics for monitoring the implementation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, but they need to be rigorously evaluated.

objectiveTo examine two DDS, the Food Groups Index (FGI), and the Minimum Dietary Diversity-Women (MDD-W), alongside two dietary quality scores, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-2010) and the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS), with risks of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs).

designThe analysis included 21,312 (GDM) and 19,917 (HDPs) singleton births reported in the Nurses' Health Study II cohort (1991-2001), among women without major chronic disease or GDM/HDPs. Scores were derived using prepregnancy diet collected by a comprehensive food frequency questionnaire. Multivariable models were utilized to calculate relative risks (RR) and confidence intervals (95%CIs).

resultsIncident GDM (n = 916) and HDPs (n = 1,421) were reported. The MDD-W and FGI were not associated with risk of GDM or HDPs, but the AHEI-2010 and PDQS were associated with a lower risk of GDM and marginally lower risk of HDP. The RR's of GDM comparing the highest vs. lowest quintiles were 1.00 (95%CI: 0.79, 1.27; p-trend = 0.82) for MDD-W, 0.96 (95%CI: 0.76, 1.22; p-trend = 0.88) for FGI, 0.63 (95%CI: 0.50, 0.81; p-trend <0.0001) for the AHEI-2010 and 0.68 (95%CI: 0.54, 0.86; p-trend = 0.003) for the PDQS. Similarly, the RR's of HDPs were 0.92 (95%CI: 0.75, 1.12, p-trend = 0.94) for MDD-W, 0.97 (95%CI: 0.79, 1.17; p-trend = 0.83) for FGI, 0.84 (95%CI: 0.70, 1.02; p-trend = 0.07) for AHEI-2010 and 0.89 (95%CI: 0.74, 1.09; p-trend = 0.07) for PDQS.

conclusionsMDD-W and FGI did not predict the risk of GDM and HDPs. These DDS should not be widely used as metrics for achieving dietary goals in their present form. The Prime Diet Quality Score warrants further testing as a promising measure of a sustainable and healthy diet on a global scale.

Indexed as

DietFood QualityAdultDiabetes, GestationalDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedNursesPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29614105
PMCPMC5882133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.