ArticlePloS one2018
Combined classification system based on ACR/EULAR and ultrasonographic scores for improving the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Value of combined application of the OMERACT scoring system and shear wave elastography for primary Sjögren's syndrome.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Practical Use of Ultrasound in Modern Rheumatology-From A to Z.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Anti-centromere antibody positivity is an independent variable associated with salivary gland ultrasonography score in Sjögren's syndrome.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Role of Major Salivary Gland Ultrasound in the Diagnostic Workup of Sicca Syndrome: A Large Single-Centre Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Screening biomarkers for Sjogren's Syndrome by computer analysis and evaluating the expression correlations with the levels of immune cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- [Diagnostic performances of salivary gland ultrasonography for Sjögren's syndrome].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022Article
- Comparison of salivary gland MRI and ultrasonography findings among patients with Sjögren's syndrome over a wide age range.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Salivary Gland Ultrasound in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: Current and Future Perspectives.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2022Review
- Sjögren syndrome: looking forward to the future.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022Review
- Ultrasound and Bioptic Investigation of Patients with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Imaging in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Incorporation of Salivary Gland Ultrasonography Into the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.Arthritis care & research · 2020Article
- Disease activity and damage in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome: Prognostic value of salivary gland ultrasonography.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of combined use of salivary gland ultrasonography (US) and the 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatic Disease (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for improving the diagnostic efficiency in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS). A US-based salivary gland disease grading system was developed using a cohort comprising 213 SS or non-SS patients who fulfilled the minimum requirements for classifying SS based on the American-European Consensus Group (AECG) and ACR criteria. Using 62 SS or non-SS patients from the 213 patients and who had also undergone all the 5 examinations needed for the ACR/EULAR classification, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of various combinations of the ACR/EULAR and US classifications for diagnosing SS, using the clinical diagnosis of SS by rheumatologists as the gold standard. The ACR/EULAR criteria discriminated clinical SS patients with 77% and 79% accuracy for those with primary or secondary SS and for those with primary SS, respectively. However, the integrated score system of the ACR/EULAR and US classifications yielded 92% and 93% accuracy for these 2 SS patient groups, respectively, provided that US score of 3 was assigned to patients with US grade ≥2, and then patients with integrated threshold score of ≥5 were diagnosed as SS. Cross-validation also indicated improved accuracy of the integrated ACR/EULAR and US score system (91.9 and 93.0% for primary/secondary and primary SS patients, respectively) over that by the ACR/EULAR criteria alone. (74.2 and 86.0%, respectively). The integrated ACR/EULAR and US scoring system can improve the diagnosis of patients with clinical SS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.