Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614074›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China.

Corina Monagin, Blanca Paccha, Ning Liang, Sally Trufan, Huiqiong Zhou, De Wu, Bradley S Schneider, Aleksei Chmura, Jonathan H Epstein, Peter Daszak and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Origin of COVID-19 and Why It Matters.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Corina MonaginMetabiota Inc., San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6715-183X
Blanca PacchaYale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Ning LiangMetabiota Inc., San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Sally TrufanUniversity of Washington Center for One Health Research, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Huiqiong ZhouGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
De WuGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bradley S SchneiderMetabiota Inc., San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Aleksei ChmuraEcoHealth Alliance, New York, United States of America.
Jonathan H EpsteinEcoHealth Alliance, New York, United States of America.
Peter DaszakEcoHealth Alliance, New York, United States of America.
Changwen KeGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Peter M RabinowitzUniversity of Washington Center for One Health Research, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on a study conducted in Guangdong Province, China, to characterize behaviors and perceptions associated with transmission of pathogens with pandemic potential in highly exposed human populations at the animal-human interface. A risk factor/exposure survey was administered to individuals with high levels of exposure to wildlife. Serological testing was performed to evaluate prior infection with several wildlife viral pathogens. Follow up serology was performed on a subset of the cohort as well as close contacts of individuals. 1,312 individuals were enrolled in the study. Contact with a wide range of wildlife species was reported in both occupational and occasional contexts. The overall proportion of individuals seropositive to any of the tested wildlife pathogens was approximately 4.0%. However, persons employed as butchers demonstrated a seropositivity of 9.0% to at least one pathogen of interest. By contrast, individuals working as hunters had lower rates of seropositivity. Among the study population, a number of other behaviors showed correlation with seropositivity, including contact with particular wildlife species such as field rats. These results demonstrate the need to further explore zoonotic risks of particular activities regarding wildlife contact, and to better understand risks of persons working as butchers with wildlife species.

Identifiers

PMID29614074
PMCPMC5882129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.