Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614073›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2018

Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science.

Michael A Johansson, Nicholas G Reich, Lauren Ancel Meyers, Marc Lipsitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ivermectin repurposing for COVID-19: pharmacological and bibliometric analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data on SARS-CoV-2 events in animals: Mind the gap!One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Publication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect?Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers.Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael A JohanssonOutbreak Science, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-7722
Nicholas G ReichOutbreak Science, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3503-9899
Lauren Ancel MeyersOutbreak Science, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.
Marc LipsitchOutbreak Science, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1504-9213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an Essay, Michael Johansson and colleagues advocate the posting of research studies addressing infectious disease outbreaks as preprints.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDatabases, FactualDisease OutbreaksPublishingCommunicable Diseases, EmergingHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansInternetPeer ReviewTime FactorsZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID29614073
PMCPMC5882117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.