Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29614068›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

An exploratory, large-scale study of pain and quality of life outcomes in cancer patients with moderate or severe pain, and variables predicting improvement.

Constanza Maximiano, Iker López, Cristina Martín, Luis Zugazabeitia, Juan L Martí-Ciriquián, Miguel A Núñez, Jorge Contreras, Michael Herdman, Susana Traseira, Mariano Provencio

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cancer pain and alcohol self-medication.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Constanza MaximianoHospital Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda, Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain.
Iker LópezHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Medical Oncology, Sevilla, Spain.
Cristina MartínHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis ZugazabeitiaHospital Povisa, Radiation Oncology, Pontevedra, Spain.
Juan L Martí-CiriquiánHospital General Universitario de Alicante, Medical Oncology, Alicante, Spain.
Miguel A NúñezHospital Santa María Nai, Medical Oncology, Ourense, Spain.
Jorge ContrerasComplejo Hospitalario Regional Carlos Haya, Radiation Oncology, Málaga, Spain.
Michael HerdmanInsight Consulting and Research, Barcelona, Spain.
Susana TraseiraMundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.L., Medical Department, Madrid, Spain.
Mariano ProvencioHospital Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda, Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-9197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been few large-scale, real world studies in Spain to assess change in pain and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in cancer patients with moderate to severe pain. This study aimed to assess changes on both outcomes after 3 months of usual care and to investigate factors associated with change in QoL. PATIENTS AND

methodsLarge, multi-centre, observational study in patients with lung, head and neck, colorectal or breast cancer experiencing a first episode of moderate to severe pain while attending one of the participating centres. QoL was assessed using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire and pain using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Instruments were administered at baseline and after 3 months of follow up. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the impact of treatment factors, demographic and clinical variables, pain and other symptoms on QoL scores.

results1711 patients were included for analysis. After 3 months of usual care, a significant improvement was observed in pain and QoL in all four cancer groups (p<0.001). Effect sizes were medium to large on the BPI and EQ-5D Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Improvements were seen on the majority of EQ-5D dimensions in all patient groups, though breast cancer patients showed the largest gains. Poorer baseline performance status (ECOG) and the presence of anxiety/depression were associated with significantly poorer QOL outcomes. Improvements in BPI pain scores were associated with improved QoL.

conclusionIn the four cancer types studied, pain and QoL outcomes improved considerably after 3 months of usual care. Improvements in pain made a substantial contribution to QoL gains whilst the presence of anxiety and depression and poor baseline performance status significantly constrained improvement.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPain ManagementQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID29614068
PMCPMC5882102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.