Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29613922›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2018

Risk Reduction Compared with Access to Care: Quantifying the Trade-Off of Enforcing a Body Mass Index Eligibility Criterion for Joint Replacement.

Nicholas J Giori, Derek F Amanatullah, Shalini Gupta, Thomas Bowe, Alex H S Harris

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of the Resolution Rate of Complications in Obese Joint Replacement Patients.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A retrospective cohort review of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas J GioriVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Derek F AmanatullahStanford University, Stanford, California.
Shalini GuptaVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Thomas BoweVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Alex H S HarrisVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USStanford University · US

Funding

Development and Validation of a Risk Calculator for Total Joint ReplacementI01HX001260 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI KUO, ALFRED C · 2016 to 2025
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001260HSRD VA IK6 HX002840HSRD VA RCS 14-232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorbidly obese patients with severe osteoarthritis benefit from successful total joint arthroplasty. However, morbid obesity increases the risk of complications. Because of this, some surgeons enforce a body mass index (BMI) eligibility criterion above which total joint arthroplasty is denied. In this study, we investigate the trade-off between avoiding complications and restricting access to care when enforcing BMI-based eligibility criteria for total joint arthroplasty.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) databases were reviewed for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty from October 2011 through September 2014. We determined, if various BMI eligibility criteria had been enforced over that period of time, how many short-term complications would have been avoided, how many complication-free surgical procedures would have been denied, and the positive predictive value of BMI eligibility criteria as tests for major complications. To provide a frame of reference, we also determined what would have happened if eligibility for total joint arthroplasty were arbitrarily determined by flipping a coin.

resultsIn this study, 27,671 total joint arthroplasties were reviewed. With a BMI criterion of ≥40 kg/m, 1,148 patients would have been denied a surgical procedure free of major complications, and 83 patients would have avoided a major complication. The positive predictive value of a complication using a BMI of ≥40 kg/m as a test for major complications was 6.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.44% to 8.33%). The positive predictive value of a complication using a BMI criterion of 30 kg/m was 5.33% (95% CI, 4.99% to 5.71%). Flipping a coin had a positive predictive value of 5.05%.

conclusionsA 30 kg/m criterion for total joint arthroplasty eligibility is marginally better than flipping a coin and should not determine surgical eligibility. With a BMI criterion of ≥40 kg/m, the number of patients denied a complication-free surgical procedure is about 14 times larger than those spared a complication. Although the acceptable balance between avoiding complications and providing access to care can be debated, such a quantitative assessment helps to inform decisions regarding the advisability of enforcing a BMI criterion for total joint arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRisk Reduction BehaviorAgedArthroplasty, ReplacementBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOsteoarthritisPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID29613922
PMCPMC5895162
OpenAlexW2795443518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.