ReviewAnnals of laboratory medicine2018
Principles of Genetic Counseling in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.
Review in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing genetic counselling supervision in southwestern Europe: the MAG-SUDOE programme.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Holding the story, holding the professional: a pilot study of genetic counselling supervision in Portugal.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Metrics Used for the Evaluation of Chatbots Providing Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment and Education: Systematic Review.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- Diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing in fetuses with central nervous system anomalies, with long-term follow-up: a single-center study over a 17-year period.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- ASCP explores the cancer biomarker testing navigator as a novel role to improve laboratory operations and workflows: A special report from the ASCP Biomarker Testing Navigator Project Team.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Family-Level Impact of Germline Genetic Testing in Childhood Cancer: A Multi Family Member Interview Analysis.Cancers · 2025Article
- GNB1 Encephalopathy: Clinical Case Report and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Advances in genetic diagnosis and therapy of hereditary heart disease: a bibliometric review from 2004 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Lateral thinking in syndromic congenital cardiovascular disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Clinical Management and Emerging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Identification of Germline Variants in Patients with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in Northeast Mexico.Genes · 2023Article
- Developing video education materials for the return of genomic test results to parents and adolescents.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa-Associated TOPORS Protein Truncating Variants Are Exclusively Located in the Region of Amino Acid Residues 807 to 867.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Current Issues, Challenges, and Future Perspectives of Genetic Counseling in Korea.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2022Review
- A Case of Next-generation Sequencing Gene Testing: Points to be Considered in Testing and Reporting.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Identification of a Novel Deep Intronic Variant by Whole Genome Sequencing Combined With RNA Sequencing in a Chinese Patient With Menkes Disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Recommendations for neonatologists and pediatricians working in first level birthing centers on the first communication of genetic disease and malformation syndrome diagnosis: consensus issued by 6 Italian scientific societies and 4 parents' associations.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Hereditary Predisposition to Prostate Cancer: From Genetics to Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Genetic Markers in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional genetic counseling has focused on the target gene and its natural progress with respect to disease risk. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can produce information on several genetic variants simultaneously, with different functions and consequences for each. Accordingly, determining the status of the patient or consultant and interpreting sequencing results from many genes can largely increase the complexity of genetic counseling. Moreover, the current environment of big data that can be readily shared via the internet and a ubiquitous network provides many different avenues for which a consultant must handle the traditional principle of genetic counseling in different ways. Thus, further consideration and rethinking of genetic counseling principles are necessary in the era of NGS. In this review, we discuss several aspects of genetic counseling that one can encounter when faced with NGS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.