Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29611105›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2018

Quality of direct oral anticoagulant prescribing in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from a large urban health system.

Shakira J Grant, Shawn Kothari, Phyllis A Gimotty, Nalaka S Gooneratne, Adam Cuker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shakira J GrantDivision of Hematology-Oncology University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shawn KothariDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Phyllis A GimottyDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nalaka S GooneratneDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adam CukerDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. adam.cuker@uphs.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-5697
University of Pennsylvania · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is common in older adults. Oral anticoagulation is indicated to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, but it also poses a risk of bleeding, particularly in the elderly. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide an alternative to warfarin and their use in the treatment of AF is growing. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the quality of DOAC prescribing in elderly patients with NVAF in a large academic health system and to compare practice with consensus best practice recommendations. We searched the electronic medical record for patients ≥ 65 years of age who were newly initiated on a DOAC for AF from January 2013 through December 2015. Patient and provider characteristics, baseline laboratory investigations, concomitant medications, and interval to first follow-up were recorded. 192 patients met eligibility criteria. The most commonly prescribed DOACs were rivaroxaban (65%) and apixaban (26%). Despite consensus recommendations that patients have a baseline creatinine, complete blood cell count, and coagulation studies prior to DOAC initiation, these tests were not performed in 18, 31, and 67% of patients, respectively. Consensus recommendations also suggest a follow-up visit within 1 month of DOAC initiation. However, only 39% of patients had a return visit within 6 weeks and 43% did not have follow-up within 12 weeks. DOAC prescribing in elderly patients with NVAF frequently fell short of quality standards. Interventions to enhance the quality of DOAC prescribing in this high-risk population are needed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationFactor Xa InhibitorsFemaleHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'PyrazolesPyridonesRetrospective StudiesRivaroxabanAnticoagulantsapixabanFactor Xa InhibitorsPyrazolesPyridonesRivaroxabanApixabanAtrial fibrillationDabigatranDirect oral anticoagulantsElderlyRivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID29611105
OpenAlexW2795780102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.