Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29611027›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2018

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Extramural Venous Invasion in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Zohra Faiz, Lotte J W Huijgen, H J Alqethami, J G M Burgerhof, Gursah Kats-Ugurlu, John T M Plukker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Lymphovascular Invasion as the Major Prognostic Factor in Node-Negative Esophageal Cancer After Primary Esophagectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zohra FaizDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lotte J W HuijgenDepartment of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
H J AlqethamiDepartment of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J G M BurgerhofDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gursah Kats-UgurluDepartment of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
John T M PlukkerDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.t.m.plukker@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtramural venous invasion (EMVI) is a known adverse prognostic factor in patients with colorectal carcinoma. The prevalence and significance of EMVI in esophageal cancer (EC) patients is still unclear.

methodsFrom a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively reviewed the resection specimens of patients with pathologic locally advanced (pT3/T4/N0-3) EC who were treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2015. Patients with previous malignancies and gastroesophageal junction (type II/III) tumors were excluded. Included were 81 patients who underwent surgery alone and 37 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). EMVI was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin slides and confirmed or excluded by additional Elastica van Gieson staining. Survival was analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression.

resultsEMVI was present in 23.5% (n = 19) of patients in the surgery-alone group and 21.6% (n = 8) of patients in the nCRT group. The prevalence of EMVI after surgery alone was significantly high in squamous cell carcinomas and among tumors located in the mid-esophagus, as well as those with lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.05). After nCRT, the presence of EMVI was significantly high in tumors with lymphovascular and perineural tumor growth (p = 0.034). EMVI status was an independent adverse prognostic factor for disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 7.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-21.8; p =0.001] and overall survival (HR 6.5, 95% CI 2.2-19.1; p = 0.001) in the surgery-alone group for node-positive tumors.

conclusionsIn this study of locally advanced > pT3/N0-3 EC patients, EMVI was present in 23.5% of patients in the surgery-alone group and in 21.6% of patients after nCRT. EMVI was an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients after surgery alone.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyAdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphatic VesselsMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant Therapy

Identifiers

PMID29611027
PMCPMC5928175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.