ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018
Rechallenge treatment with a platinum-based regimen in patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and toxicity of lurbinectedin in subsequent systemic therapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of the second-line treatments for patients with small cell lung cancer sensitive to previous platinum-based chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Revisiting Platinum Sensitivity in Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Outcomes of Platinum-Containing Doublet Chemotherapy in the 3-6 Month Relapse Window.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab reintroduction in advanced biliary tract cancer: a multinational real-world analysis.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Metachronous Second Primary in the Form of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Following Treatment of Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Dual Tracer PET/CT Findings Highlighting SSTR2 Expression and Its Theranostic Implications.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Bi-weekly irinotecan is an effective and convenient regimen in the treatment of relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Review
- Efficacy of carboplatin-etoposide rechallenge after first-line chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC: an international multicentric analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Real-World Outcomes with Lurbinectedin in Second Line and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in Korea.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- The Impact of Chemosensitivity on the Outcome of Brain Metastases in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Re-challenge chemotherapy in patients with sensitive relapse small-cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Surgery as a Potential Treatment Option for Patients With Stage III Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), those who relapse > 90 days after first-line chemotherapy are classified sensitive relapse. Rechallenge with a first-line platinum-based regimen has been used in sensitive relapsed SCLC patients, but its importance is not known. We evaluated the outcome of rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy for sensitive relapse patients. We reviewed consecutive patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC who received second-line chemotherapy between January 1999 and December 2016. We evaluated the treatment outcomes of platinum-based rechallenge and non-rechallenge regimens for second-line chemotherapy in sensitive relapse patients. Of 245 patients, 81 sensitive relapse patients received second-line chemotherapy. Sixty-seven patients (82.7%) were treated with rechallenging platinum-based regimens ("rechallenge group") and 14 patients (17.3%) were treated with other regimens ("non-rechallenge group") as second-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months in the rechallenge group and 3.5 months in the non-rechallenge group, and median survival time was 10.8 and 8.2 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in PFS or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Sub-analyses of patients who received chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment showed that the rechallenge group had longer PFS than that of the non-rechallenge group (median 5.4 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.0038), and the rechallenge group had a tendency to have longer OS than non-rechallenge group. These data suggest that rechallenge treatment with a platinum-based regimen could be second-line chemotherapy in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC, especially those treated with chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.