ReviewPediatric surgery international2018
Surgical perspectives regarding application of biomaterials for the management of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects.
Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical morbidity of primary versus patch repaired congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Thoracotomy patch repair of large diaphragmatic herniae in a porcine model: a tale of two patches.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Review
- Diaphragmatic hernia repair porcine model to compare the performance of biodegradable membranes against Gore-TexPediatric surgery international · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a biodegradable polyurethane patch for repair of diaphragmatic hernia in a rat model: A pilot study.Journal of pediatric surgery · 2023Article
- The use of biological membranes for correction of congenital malformations.Cell and tissue banking · 2022Article
- Mussel-inspired biomaterials: From chemistry to clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
- Design of New Concept of Knitted Hernia Implant.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Recurrence of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Risk Factors, Management, and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- The Role of Mesh Implants in Surgical Treatment of Parastomal Hernia.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Porcine dermal patches as a risk factor for recurrence after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Article
- Longitudinal Follow-Up With Radiologic Screening for Recurrence and Secondary Hiatal Hernia in Neonates With Open Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia-A Large Prospective, Observational Cohort Study at One Referral Center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Application of computer tomography-based 3D reconstruction technique in hernia repair surgery.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Biomaterials in fetal surgery.Biomaterials science · 2019Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Analysis ofIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review focuses on the surgical viewpoints on patch repairs in neonates with large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects. The main focus is on the various biomaterials that have been employed to date with regard to their source of origins, degradation properties as well as tissue integration characteristics. Further focus is on the present knowledge on patch integration when biomaterials are placed in the diaphragmatic defect. The review will also look at the present evidence on the biomechanical characteristics of the most commonly used biomaterials and compares these materials to diaphragmatic tissue to offer more insight on the present practice of patch repairs in large defects. Since tissue engineering and regenerative medicine has offered another dimension to diaphragmatic replacement, a detailed overview of this technology will be undertaken with regard to cell sourcing, scaffolds, in vitro versus in vivo implants as well as quality of tissue produced, to explore the limitations and the feasibility facing the scientific community in its clinical implementation of skeletal muscle-engineered tissue beyond laboratory research for diaphragmatic replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.