Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018
Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving trends in cochlear implant reimplantation: An analysis of causes and outcomes at a tertiary referral cohort.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- A deep learning framework for the localization of landmarks on the lateral semi circular canals.PloS one · 2026Article
- Intra-Cochlear Electrode Position Impacts the Preservation of Residual Hearing in an Animal Model of Cochlear Implant Surgery.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a clinical method for selective electrode deactivation in cochlear implant programming.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Assessing the Placement of the Cochlear Slim Perimodiolar Electrode Array by Trans Impedance Matrix Analysis: A Temporal Bone Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Analysis of Neural Interface When Using Modiolar Electrode Stimulation. Radiological Evaluation, Trans-Impedance Matrix Analysis and Effect on Listening Effort in Cochlear Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Unifying information theory and machine learning in a model of electrode discrimination in cochlear implants.PloS one · 2021Article
- Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020Article
- Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design on Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures: Lateral Wall versus Perimodiolar Types.Journal of audiology & otology · 2019Article
- Considerations and Rationale for Cochlear Implant Electrode Design - Past, Present and Future.The journal of international advanced otology · 2018Article
- Assessing Array-Type Differences in Cochlear Implant Users Using the Panoramic ECAP Method.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of electrode discrimination based on electrode to modiolus distance in different cochlear implant models, using image information to estimate the outcomes after an implantation on electrode discrimination
methodsA descriptive prospective randomized study performed during 16 months. A psychoacoustic platform was used to evaluate patients' electrode discrimination capabilities of patients. For the acquisition of the images, a cone beam computed tomography was used to assess postcochlear implantation of electrodes' position. We considered two other new measurements: the intracochlear position index, which indicates how far is the electrode from the modiolar wall, and the homogeneity factor (HF), which provides us with information about the distance between the electrodes and the modiolus
results21 postlingually deaf adults showing different CI models [CI522 (n = 7), CI512 (n = 7), and CI532 (n = 7)] that corresponded to the lateral and perimodiolar array electrodes. The average success rate of the CI522 group was 47%, of the CI512 group was 48%, and of the CI532 group was 77%. There is statistically significant difference between groups CI532-CI522 (p = 0.0033) and CI532-CI512 (p = 0.0027)
conclusionThe Nucleus CI532 offers a better perimodiolar placement. HF and IPI measurements provide information about the electrodes location inside the cochlea, being related to electrode discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29610960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.