Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29610956›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Prognostic role of serial quantitative evaluation of

Daniele Muser, Pasquale Santangeli, Simon A Castro, Jackson J Liang, Andres Enriquez, Thomas J Werner, Gaetano Nucifora, Silvia Magnani, Tatsuya Hayashi, Erica S Zado and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Innovations in Imaging:Current cardiology reports · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Machine learning approach usingJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Sarcoid heart disease and imaging.Heart rhythm O2 · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prednisone vs methotrexate in treatment naïve cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  16. FDG uptake patterns in isolated and systemic cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Cardiac sarcoidosis: the role of cardiac MRI andThe British journal of cardiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Potential novel imaging targets of inflammation in cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Controversies in the Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniele MuserCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pasquale SantangeliCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Simon A CastroCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2382-6708
Jackson J LiangCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andres EnriquezCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas J WernerDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Gaetano NuciforaNorthwest Heart Center, Wythenshawe Hospital, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Silvia MagnaniCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tatsuya HayashiCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Erica S ZadoCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Fermin C GarciaCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David J CallansCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sanjay DixitCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Benoit DesjardinsDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Francis E MarchlinskiCardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abass AlaviDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. abass.alavi@uphs.upenn.edu.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) with

objectivesWe sought to investigate the clinical impact of serial quantitative FDG uptake analysis in patients with CS presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) treated by catheter ablation (CA).

methodsWe followed 20 patients (51 ± 9 years, 70% males) with CS and VT who underwent CA, with 92 serial FDG-PET scans (3-10 per patient). Myocardial FDG-avid lesions were quantified using three parameters: maximum standardized uptake value (SUV

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 35 (20-66) months, 18 MACE (1 death, 2 heart transplants, 12 ICD appropriate interventions, 3 hospitalizations) occurred in 12 (60%) patients. At univariable analysis, lack of PET improvement (defined by decrease in LMA of at least 25%) was the only variable associated with cardiac events during follow-up. In particular, non-responders had a 20-fold higher risk of MACE at follow-up (HR 18.96, 95% CI 2.26-159.27; p = 0.007). Moreover, a significant linear inverse relationship was observed between changes in LMA and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction over follow-up (β = -20.11; p = 0.003).

conclusionsIn patients with CS and VT, temporal change in FDG uptake evaluated by a quantitative approach is associated with parallel change in systolic function. Moreover, reduction in FDG uptake is strongly associated with fewer MACE at long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSarcoidosisTachycardia, VentricularFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsCardiac sarcoidosisFDG-PETHeart failureMetabolic activityVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID29610956
OpenAlexW2795447037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.