Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29610955›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Prognostic value of [

Antje Stolzenburg, Katharina Lückerath, Samuel Samnick, Martin Speer, Katharina Kneer, Jan-Stefan Schmid, Götz Ulrich Grigoleit, Susanne Hofmann, Ambros J Beer, Donald Bunjes and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Reduced splenic uptake onTheranostics · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparison between tumour metabolism derived fromQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The value ofOncology letters · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cancers · 2020
    Article
  14. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antje StolzenburgDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Katharina LückerathDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Samuel SamnickDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Martin SpeerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Katharina KneerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulm, Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Jan-Stefan SchmidDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Götz Ulrich GrigoleitDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Susanne HofmannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University of Ulm, Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Ambros J BeerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulm, Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Donald BunjesDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University of Ulm, Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Stefan KnopDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas K BuckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Hermann EinseleDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Constantin LapaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany. lapa_C@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7536-2207
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung 2013.906.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite improved treatment options, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, we evaluated [

resultsPET/CT negativity -prior to or following allo-HCT- was a favorable prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival (both, PFS and OS: pre-HSCT p < 0.001, post-HCT p < 0.005). High FDG-uptake (SUV

conclusion[

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedCytogenetic AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, HomologousFluorodeoxyglucose F18Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationFDG-PET/CTMolecular imagingMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID29610955
OpenAlexW2795614821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.