ArticleCurrent microbiology2018
Cross-Reactivity of Prokaryotic 16S rDNA-Specific Primers to Eukaryotic DNA: Mistaken Microbial Community Profiling in Environmental Samples.
Article in Current microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic-Induced Gut Dysbiosis Modulates Alzheimer's Disease-Associated Gene Expression and Protein Aggregation in 3xTg-AD Mice via the Gut-Brain Axis.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Challenges and Control Strategies of Odor Emission from Composting Operation.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences are characteristically used as gold-standard genetic marker for the determination of bacterial and/or archaeal biodiversity, and community profiling of environmental samples. The 16S rRNA amplicon analysis till-date is taken as a standard method for investigation and identification of uncultivable bacteria in microbial diversity studies. The accuracy of these analyses strongly depends upon the choice of primers. It is presumed that these primers do not participate in non-specific amplifications. In the present study, by in silico, PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis, we have shown that primers do cross-react with eukaryotic DNAs as well, eventually leading to overestimation of microbial biodiversity. We further demonstrated that the overestimation is not only due to cross-reaction with eukaryotic mitochondrial or plastid DNA, but also with eukaryotic chromosomal DNA, that is ubiquitous in environmental samples. We tried to establish methanogenic diversity in municipal solid waste (MSW) leachates and cow dung samples before and after enrichment of the prokaryotic DNA from eukaryotic ones. Results revealed that bands disappeared/get lightened in bacterial 16S rRNA-based DGGE community profiles, after prokaryotic DNA enrichment, but not in mcrA-based community profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.