Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29610737›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2018

Variable selection in Logistic regression model with genetic algorithm.

Zhongheng Zhang, Victor Trevino, Sayed Shahabuddin Hoseini, Smaranda Belciug, Arumugam Manivanna Boopathi, Ping Zhang, Florin Gorunescu, Velappan Subha, Songshi Dai

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine learning can predict surgical indication: new clustering model from a large adult spine deformity database.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhongheng ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.
Victor TrevinoCatedra de Bioinformatica, Escuela de Medicina, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Sayed Shahabuddin HoseiniDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Smaranda BelciugDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Arumugam Manivanna BoopathiDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ariyalur Engineering College, Ariyalur, Tamilnadu, India.
Ping ZhangMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Florin GorunescuDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Piteşti, Piteşti, Romania.
Velappan SubhaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India.
Songshi DaiCollege of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variable or feature selection is one of the most important steps in model specification. Especially in the case of medical-decision making, the direct use of a medical database, without a previous analysis and preprocessing step, is often counterproductive. In this way, the variable selection represents the method of choosing the most relevant attributes from the database in order to build a robust learning models and, thus, to improve the performance of the models used in the decision process. In biomedical research, the purpose of variable selection is to select clinically important and statistically significant variables, while excluding unrelated or noise variables. A variety of methods exist for variable selection, but none of them is without limitations. For example, the stepwise approach, which is highly used, adds the best variable in each cycle generally producing an acceptable set of variables. Nevertheless, it is limited by the fact that it commonly trapped in local optima. The best subset approach can systematically search the entire covariate pattern space, but the solution pool can be extremely large with tens to hundreds of variables, which is the case in nowadays clinical data. Genetic algorithms (GA) are heuristic optimization approaches and can be used for variable selection in multivariable regression models. This tutorial paper aims to provide a step-by-step approach to the use of GA in variable selection. The R code provided in the text can be extended and adapted to other data analysis needs.

Indexed as

galgogenetic algorithm (GA)Logistic regressionvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID29610737
PMCPMC5879502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.