Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29610733›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2018

Peculiarities of intra-thoracic colon interposition-eso-coloplasty: indications, surgical management and outcomes.

Lucile Gust, Henri De Lesquen, Ilies Bouabdallah, Geoffrey Brioude, Pascal-Alexandre Thomas, Xavier-Benoit D'journo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surgical options in retrosternal oesophageal reconstruction.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucile GustDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Disease of the Oesophagus and Lung Transplantation, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Henri De LesquenDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sainte Anne Military Teaching Hospital, Toulon, France.
Ilies BouabdallahDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Disease of the Oesophagus and Lung Transplantation, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Geoffrey BrioudeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Disease of the Oesophagus and Lung Transplantation, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Pascal-Alexandre ThomasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Disease of the Oesophagus and Lung Transplantation, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Xavier-Benoit D'journoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Disease of the Oesophagus and Lung Transplantation, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomach is the usual organ of choice for oesophageal replacement. Gastric pull-up is a standardized, fast and secure procedure, requiring only one anastomosis and usually performed with mini-invasive techniques. Colon is used when the stomach is not available, for tumours of the upper oesophagus or the hypopharynx, for benign or paediatric diseases. It is a complex surgery requiring a specific pre-operative management, three or four anastomoses, and a careful choice of the route of reconstruction. Early post-operative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, are frequent. Long-term outcomes are marked by strictures of the anastomosis and redundancy, but the reported quality of life of the patients is good. Eso-coloplasty remains a safe and feasible alternative to gastric pull-up for oesophageal replacement, for specific indications.

Indexed as

colon interpositioncoloplastyEsophagectomygastric pull-upredundancy

Identifiers

PMID29610733
PMCPMC5879509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.