ArticleCureus2018
Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Topography-guided Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis in Virgin Eyes.
Article in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of a corneal wavefront- and topography-guided platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis on virgin eyes: an expanded cohort study.International ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Topography versus non-topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy with corneal cross-linking variations in keratoconus.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Topography-Guided Refractive Astigmatism Outcomes: Predictions Comparing Three Different Programming Methods.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Mutual comparative analysis: a new topography-guided custom ablation protocol referencing subjective refraction to modify corneal topographic data.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2020Article
- Lasik as a Solution for High Hypermetropia.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction We wanted to assess the efficacy, predictability, and stability of topography-guided, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (TGL) on normal untreated eyes with a preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20. Methods This was a retrospective, non-randomized, and single arm study evaluating the outcomes of TGL in eyes with a preoperative BCVA of 20/20. We included 50 eyes of 50 patients who presented to the Hashmanis Hospital, Pakistan and were followed for six months postoperatively. All eyes underwent treatment using the Alcon Wavelight Allegro Topolyzer (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., TX, USA). Results The mean preoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE) values were -4.3 ± 1.6 dioptres (D), -1.0 ± 0.8 D, and -4.8 ± 1.8 D. On day one these values were 0.2 ± 0.8 D, -0.5 ± 0.3, and 0.3 ± 0.8, respectively, and on month six they were -0.1 ± 0.6, -0.5 ± 0.3, and -0.4 ± 0.6 D, respectively. On postoperative day one and month six, 86% and 94% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/20 or better, respectively. Two eyes (4%) had an SE change of greater than 0.5 D from three to six months. Conclusion Our study demonstrates good efficacy, predictability, and stability of eyes undergoing TGL with a follow-up of six months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.