Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29610676›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2018

Pregnant or recently pregnant opioid users: contraception decisions, perceptions and preferences.

Rebecca L Fischbein, Bethany G Lanese, Lynn Falletta, Kelsey Hamilton, Jennifer A King, Deric R Kenne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca L Fischbein1Department of Family and Community Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 St. Rt. 44, PO Box 95, Rootstown, OH 44272 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4373-2039
Bethany G Lanese2College of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Kent State University, 750 Hilltop Drive, 322 Lowry Hall, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA.
Lynn Falletta2College of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Kent State University, 750 Hilltop Drive, 322 Lowry Hall, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA.
Kelsey Hamilton2College of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Kent State University, 750 Hilltop Drive, 322 Lowry Hall, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA.
Jennifer A KingOld Brooklyn Community Development Corporation, Cleveland, OH USA.
Deric R Kenne2College of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Kent State University, 750 Hilltop Drive, 322 Lowry Hall, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple factors are linked to extremely high unintended pregnancy rates among women who use opioids, including various barriers to contraception adherence. These include patient level barriers such as lack of knowledge and education about highly effective contraception, and potential provider barriers. Using a mixed-methods framework to examine the contraception-related perceptions and preferences of opioid using women is a necessary next step to understanding this phenomenon.

methodsA mixed-method study was conducted which included both self-report questionnaires along with a semi-structured qualitative interview of opioid-using pregnant or recently pregnant women in two drug treatment facilities in Ohio.

resultsForty-two women completed the study. The majority of recent (75%) and total pregnancies were unintended. Male condoms were reported as the highest form of lifetime contraception used within the present sample (69%). Participants reported low lifetime use of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) (ranging from 5 to 12%). Participants preferred hormonal injections first (40%), followed by IUDs (17%). Reasons for preferences of injections and LARC were similar: not needing to remember, side effects, and long-term effectiveness.

conclusionsMost of the study population participants stated they would utilize contraception, particularly Tier 1 LARC methods, if freely available; however, high rates of unintended pregnancy were observed in this sample. This indicates the need for contraception education, and addressing the procedural, logistical and economic barriers that may be preventing the use of LARC among this population.

Indexed as

ContraceptionOpioid Drug UsePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29610676
PMCPMC5870942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.