Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29609656›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2018

Perspectives of primary health care staff on the implementation of a sexual health quality improvement program: a qualitative study in remote aboriginal communities in Australia.

Belinda Hengel, Stephen Bell, Linda Garton, James Ward, Alice Rumbold, Debbie Taylor-Thomson, Bronwyn Silver, Skye McGregor, Amalie Dyda, Janet Knox and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Belinda HengelApunipima Cape York Health Council, PO Box 12045, Earlville, Cairns, Qld, 4870, Australia. belinda.hengel@apunipima.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-7716
Stephen BellKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Linda GartonNT Department of Health, Sexual Health and Blood Borne Virus Unit, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.
James WardSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Alice RumboldMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, 0810, Australia.
Debbie Taylor-ThomsonMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, 0810, Australia.
Bronwyn SilverCentral Australian Aboriginal Congress, Alice Springs, NT, 0870, Australia.
Skye McGregorKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Amalie DydaKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Janet KnoxLismore Sexual Health Service, NSW Health, Sydney, NSW, 2480, Australia.
Rebecca GuyKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Lisa MaherKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
John Martin KaldorKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
STRIVE Investigators
UNSW Sydney · AUGovernment of Western Australia Department of Health · AUMenzies School of Health Research · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUAustralian Research Council · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 568806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people living in remote Australian Aboriginal communities experience high rates of sexually transmissible infections (STIs). STRIVE (STIs in Remote communities, ImproVed and Enhanced primary care) was a cluster randomised control trial of a sexual health continuous quality improvement (CQI) program. As part of the trial, qualitative research was conducted to explore staff perceptions of the CQI components, their normalisation and integration into routine practice, and the factors which influenced these processes.

methodsIn-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 41 clinical staff at 22 remote community clinics during 2011-2013. Normalisation process theory was used to frame the analysis of interview data and to provide insights into enablers and barriers to the integration and normalisation of the CQI program and its six specific components.

resultsOf the CQI components, participants reported that the clinical data reports had the highest degree of integration and normalisation. Action plan setting, the Systems Assessment Tool, and the STRIVE coordinator role, were perceived as adding value to the program, but were less readily integrated or normalised. The remaining two components (dedicated funding for health promotion and service incentive payments) were seen as least relevant. Our analysis also highlighted factors which enabled greater integration of the CQI components. These included familiarity with CQI tools, increased accountability of health centre staff and the translation of the CQI program into guideline-driven care. The analysis also identified barriers, including high staff turnover, limited time involved in the program and competing clinical demands and programs.

conclusionsAcross all of the CQI components, the clinical data reports had the highest degree of integration and normalisation. The action plans, systems assessment tool and the STRIVE coordinator role all complemented the data reports and allowed these components to be translated directly into clinical activity. To ensure their uptake, CQI programs must acknowledge local clinical guidelines, be compatible with translation into clinical activity and have managerial support. Sexual health CQI needs to align with other CQI activities, engage staff and promote accountability through the provision of clinic specific data and regular face-to-face meetings.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000358044 . Registered 6/05/2010. Prospectively Registered.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Services, IndigenousHumansMalePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementResearch DesignRural Health ServicesSexual HealthSexually Transmitted DiseasesAboriginalContinuous quality improvementNormalisation process theorySexual health

Identifiers

PMID29609656
PMCPMC5879735
OpenAlexW2802710541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.